A tuning fork measured by a police radar gun

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the operation of a police radar gun that emits radio waves at a frequency of 10.5 GHz to measure the speed of objects, such as a tuning fork traveling at 24.6 m/s. The participants explore the relationship between the frequency of the reflected waves and the frequency of the tuning fork, utilizing the Doppler effect formula to derive the tuning fork's frequency. The key insight is that the frequency shift in the reflected waves corresponds to the tuning fork's frequency due to the nature of wave interactions, despite the tuning fork's small amplitude relative to the wavelength of the radio waves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler effect in wave physics
  • Familiarity with radio wave frequencies and their measurement
  • Knowledge of basic wave properties, including frequency and amplitude
  • Ability to apply mathematical formulas related to wave reflection
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Doppler effect in detail, focusing on its mathematical applications
  • Research the principles of wave reflection and interference
  • Explore the physics of radio waves and their interaction with moving objects
  • Learn about the calibration and operation of police radar guns
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers working with radar technology, and professionals involved in speed measurement and wave analysis will benefit from this discussion.

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6
A police radar gun emits radio waves at 10.5 GHz, and measures the beats between this frequency and the returned waves to determine the speed of an object.

It registers a tuning fork as "traveling" at 24.6 m/s. What is the frequency of the tuning fork.

I can get the answer, but I don't understand why it's the answer.

I used the formula for change in frequency of reflected waves seen here:

PStzkdj.gif


link: http://i.imgur.com/PStzkdj.gif

It gives the correct answer as per the back of the text, if you plug in all the relevant variables. I kind of just guessed at using that formula, because it's the only one where the available variables fit the information the question gives.

Now I understand, that from the POV of the light waves, the tuning fork is moving very slowly, and that while the tuning fork is swaying in one direction, millions of light waves have the chance to hit and reflect off the fork. So I can understand how the tuning fork being hit by the radio waves can cause a shift in the frequency of the reflected waves.

But why is the shift in the frequency of the reflected radio waves the same as the frequency of the tuning fork?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The amplitude of the oscillation of the tuning fork is significantly smaller than 1 wavelength. All you get is a phase shift that oscillates around some unknown central value with the frequency of the tuning fork. The interference signal will probably (depending on where the central phase is) also oscillate with this frequency, which could get interpreted using the formula you posted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K