A universe where Zeno is right and the law of inertia still holds

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ahmadphy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Zeno's paradox asserts that motion is impossible due to the requirement of completing infinitely many steps. This paradox is addressed in Newtonian physics by the assumption of continuous space and time, allowing for smooth motion governed by inertia. The discussion explores the hypothetical scenario of a universe where Zeno's paradox holds true while still adhering to the law of inertia, concluding that such a scenario is not feasible. The consensus is that Zeno's argument is fundamentally flawed, and even if it were valid, it would not provide insights into quantum superposition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Zeno's paradox and its implications
  • Familiarity with Newtonian physics and the concept of inertia
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics, particularly quantum superposition
  • Awareness of spacetime theories, including continuous and discrete models
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Zeno's paradox in detail and its historical context
  • Explore Newtonian physics principles, focusing on inertia and motion
  • Read introductory quantum mechanics textbooks, such as Giancarlo Girardi's "Sneaking a Look at God's Cards"
  • Investigate the implications of discrete spacetime models in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physicists, and students of quantum mechanics seeking to understand the relationship between classical motion and paradoxes in physics.

ahmadphy
Zeno’s paradox suggests motion is impossible due to the need to complete infinitely many steps. In Newtonian physics, this is resolved by assuming space and time are continuous, and motion follows smoothly by inertia.
But is it conceivable to imagine a hypothetical universe where space and time are structured (e.g.in a nonstandard way ) such that Zeno’s paradox holds literally yet objects still obey a law of inertia in some consistent form?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
No.
 
ahmadphy said:
Zeno’s paradox suggests motion is impossible due to the need to complete infinitely many steps. In Newtonian physics, this is resolved by assuming space and time are continuous, and motion follows smoothly by inertia.
Assuming some sort of fine-grained spacetime would also resolve the paradox. That's what happens with motion simulated on a computer screen. In fact, that's a clearer solution to the paradox as there comes a point where the object moves from one cell to the next. And the motion cannot be further subdivided.
 
Maybe I shouldn't ask this here but:
If we could imagine a universe where Zeno's paradox is literally true but inertia still holds, could that maybe explain the quantum superposition?
 
ahmadphy said:
If we could imagine a universe where Zeno's paradox is literally true but inertia still holds, could that maybe explain the quantum superposition?
No.
The posts above have already established that Zeno's argument is bogus (Zeno himself, of course, knew that it was bogus because of course motion is possible) whether spacetime is continuous or discrete, so this question is like asking "If 2+2=5 could that maybe explain why water is wet?"... No, a false statement can't explain anything.

And even if the argument were valid, quantum superposition isn't what you're thinking it is. If you aren't up for taking on a first-year QM textbook (several good recommendations in the textbooks section here) yo might try Giancarlo Girardi's book "Sneaking a look at god's cards".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
Closed pending moderation
 
After moderator review, the thread will remain closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
510
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
652
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
561