A Zorich proposition about local charts of smooth surfaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Zorich's theorem regarding local charts of smooth surfaces, specifically the mapping ##\varphi:I_k\to U_S(x_0)##, where ##I_k## is a k-dimensional unit cube and ##U_S(x_0)## is a neighborhood of a point ##x_0## on the surface ##S##. Participants analyze the use of the inverse function theorem to establish that ##\varphi## is a diffeomorphism between neighborhoods in ##\mathbb{R}^k##. The conversation highlights the significance of extending a diffeomorphism from a lower-dimensional manifold to all of ##\mathbb{R}^n##, using the example of the mapping ##\phi(x,y)=(x,y,\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2})## as a practical illustration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, particularly diffeomorphisms.
  • Familiarity with the inverse function theorem.
  • Knowledge of smooth manifolds and their properties.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical analysis, specifically in the context of mappings in Euclidean spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the inverse function theorem in detail, focusing on its applications in differential geometry.
  • Explore the concept of diffeomorphisms and their significance in manifold theory.
  • Investigate local charts and their role in understanding smooth surfaces.
  • Examine examples of mappings between different dimensional spaces, particularly in the context of smooth manifolds.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of differential geometry, and researchers interested in the properties of smooth surfaces and their mappings in higher-dimensional spaces.

Unconscious
Messages
77
Reaction score
12
From Zorich, Mathematical Analysis II, 1st ed., pag.163:

kc0W8.png


where the referred mapping (12.1) is a map ##\varphi:I_k\to U_S(x_0)##, in which:

1. ##I_k\subset\mathbb{R}^n## is the k-dimensional unit cube,
2. ##x_0## is a generic point on the surface ##S## and ##U_S(x_0)## is a neighborhood of ##x_0## of points of ##S##.

I think that there is a deep significance in this theorem that I can't see yet, but anyway, looking brutally at the proof:

W70oc.png


we can see that up to this point the author uses the inverse function theorem to say that, if we consider only the first k coordinates both in the domain and in the range, ## \varphi ## is actually a diffeomorphism between two suitable neighborhoods ## U_{ \mathbb {R}^k_t} (0) ## e ## U _ {\mathbb {R} ^ k_x} (\varphi (0)) ##.
Then, the proof continues in this way:

yHB59.png


and here I don't understand why the whole ## f: U _ {\mathbb {R} ^ n_x} (\varphi (0)) \to U_ {\mathbb {R} ^ n_t} (0) ## (##n## instead of ##k##) should be a diffeomorphism. Indeed, it seems to me that ## t ^ {k + 1}, ..., t ^ n ## are always zero, as ##x## varies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your claim that ##f^l(x_1,...,x_n)=x^l## for ##l >k##? That seems unlikely (or you would have had something that was diffeomorphic on the whole space to begin with).

EDIT: sorry, I was too hasty. ##f^l## is only a function of ##x_1,...,x_k##, so could not possibly be equal to ##x_l## for ##l>k##.

To address your other possible confusion (though maybe you get the point and you're just not sure why it matters), the point of the theorem is if you have a diffeomorphism mapping to some lower dimensional manifold of ##\mathbb{R}^n## you can extend it (at least locally) to a diffeomorphism mapping to all of ##\mathbb{R}^n##.

It might help to consider an example. ##\phi(x,y)=(x,y,\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2})## is a function from a small square around the origin in ##\mathbb{R}^2## to a 2 dimensional manifold in ##\mathbb{R}^3##. All the proof is doing is saying you can turn this into ##\phi(x,y,z)=(x,y,z+\sqrt{1-x^2-y2})## and now it's a map from a small region around the origin in ##\mathbb{R}^3## to a 3 d submanifold of ##\mathbb{R}^3##.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K