MHB *aa3.2 Let Q be the group of rational numbers under addition

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
aa3.2

Let Q be the group of rational numbers under addition
and let $Q^∗$ be the group of
nonzero rational numbers under multiplication.
In $Q$, list the elements in $\langle\frac{1}{2} \rangle$,
In ${Q^∗}$ list elements in $\langle\frac{1}{2}\rangle $

ok just had time to post and clueless
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi karush,

Can you provide some attempt, or at least some initial thoughts please?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi karush,

Can you provide some attempt, or at least some initial thoughts please?
In Q,
$\langle\frac{1}{2}\rangle
=\left\{\cdots,-2,-\frac{3}{2},-1,-\frac{1}{2},
0,\frac{1}{2},1,\frac{3}{2},2\cdots\right\}
=\left\{\frac{n}{2}\vert n \in \Bbb{Z}\right\}$
 
karush said:
In Q,
$\langle\frac{1}{2}\rangle
=\left\{\cdots,-2,-\frac{3}{2},-1,-\frac{1}{2},
0,\frac{1}{2},1,\frac{3}{2},2\cdots\right\}
=\left\{\frac{n}{2}\vert n \in \Bbb{Z}\right\}$

Yep. That is correct. (Nod)

How did you find it?
Can you also find $\langle\frac{1}{2}\rangle$ in $\mathbb Q^*$?
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. That is correct. (Nod)

How did you find it?
Can you also find $\langle\frac{1}{2}\rangle$ in $\mathbb Q^*$?
In $Q*$
$\langle\frac{1}{2}\rangle
=\left\{\cdots, 4,2,1,\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{4}, \cdots\right\}
=\left\{2^n\vert n \in \Bbb{Z}\right\}$
sorta!

$Q$ and $Q^\ast$ as above.
Find the order of each element in $Q$ and $Q^\ast$

ok is this like $4=2^2$
 
Last edited:
karush said:
In $Q*$
$\langle\frac{1}{2}\rangle
=\left\{\cdots, 4,2,1,\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{4}, \cdots\right\}
=\left\{2^n\vert n \in \Bbb{Z}\right\}$
sorta!

$Q$ and $Q^\ast$ as above.
Find the order of each element in $Q$ and $Q^\ast$

ok is this like $4=2^2$

Nope.
The order of an element is the number of times we have to add (respectively multiply) it before we get the identity element.
So in $\mathbb Q$, how many times do we have to add $\frac 12$ before we get $0$?
And how many times do we have to add $0$ before we get $0$?
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
347
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
675
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K