About Feynman rules for an external field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Feynman rules in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) when considering external fields, specifically the scattering of electrons in the presence of external electric or magnetic fields. The key takeaway is that external fields are represented by external lines in Feynman diagrams, which carry momentum and polarization. The amplitude for scattering must be multiplied by the Fourier transform of the external field, evaluated at the conserved 4-momentum of the process. The choice of metric and the definition of the Fourier transform significantly influence the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their components
  • Familiarity with Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms in the context of quantum field theory
  • Basic principles of momentum conservation in particle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles," specifically chapter 7.6 and example 7.4
  • Learn about the role of external fields in QFT and their representation in Feynman diagrams
  • Explore the implications of different metric choices on scattering amplitudes
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of Fourier transforms in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory and its applications in particle physics, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of scattering processes in the presence of external fields.

Sleuth
Messages
46
Reaction score
4
Hi everybody, I'm new.
I'm approaching to QFT in these months and I have a couple of questions about Feynman rules.
The most of the books I have read (or tried to) explain feynman rules telling what you have to do when you have an internal or external line in a graph, and when you have a vertex, but I wasn't able to find a complete treatment and justification of what you have to do when you consider an external field.
For example what happens when I want to study the scattering of an electron with an external electric of magnetic field? Let's say we are in QED: do I simply have to multiply the vertex for the external field (say ieA^\mu \gamma_mu)? and why? do I have to integrate over the momenta of the external fields? can I use the conservation of momenta on the modified vertex in the same way?
I understand that maybe this is a really trivial question, but I would like to find someone explaining this in a complete and not-misleading way.
Thank you all
S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An external field is represented by an external line. It is an incoming photon and it carries some momentum and polarization. As with all external lines, you label the line with a momentum [tex]p[/tex] and a spin [tex]s[/tex] (it will then hit some vertex where stuff like momentum conservation is imposed). They also contribute an overall factor: the line is external so there is some incoming and outcoming orientation, the polarization of the vector (notation: [tex]\epsilon_\mu(k)[/tex]).

See for instance Griffiths - Introduction to Elementary particles, chapter 7.6 and example 7.4.

Note that this is the contribution of the scattering of a very specific photon (carrying momentum p and a polarization). We can average over the polarization, and impose some distribution on the momenta p - this gives a more realistic description of the external field.
 
I think you just multiply the amplitude with the Fourier transformation of the external field, taken at the 4-momentum value that conserves 4-momentum for the entire process. So if you have an incoming electron with momentum p, and outgoing electron with momentum p', then you would multiply your amplitude by A(p-p') or A(p'-p). Which one I think depends on your choice of metric, (+1,-1-1-1) or (-1,+1,+1,+1), and also how you define the Fourier transform of the external field (whether your formula is integral of A(q)e^(-iqx) or integral of A(q)e^(+iqx).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K