Feynman rule for closed fermion loop in QED

  • #1
1,344
33
One of the Feynman rules of QED is the following:

For a closed fermionic loop, the Feynman rule is to start at an arbitrary vertex or propagator, follow the line until we get back to the starting point, multiply all the vertices and the propagators in the order of the line, then take the trace of the matrix product. In addition, we include a negative sign for every closed fermionic loop.

For an open fermionic line, we must trace from the head of the line to the tail. In other words, we must start by writing down the polarization spinor for the line with outgoing charge, ..., and finally the polarization spinor for the line with the incoming charge.

Is there also a rule for closed fermionic loop that we must trace the loop in the direction opposite to the direction of the charge flow?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
34,618
12,801
For an open fermionic line, we must trace from the head of the line to the tail. In other words, we must start by writing down the polarization spinor for the line with outgoing charge, ..., and finally the polarization spinor for the line with the incoming charge.

You write down the spinors because the head and tail are external legs in the diagram.

Is there also a rule for closed fermionic loop that we must trace the loop in the direction opposite to the direction of the charge flow?

You don't write down spinors corresponding to external legs for a closed fermion loop, because it has no external legs.
 
  • #4
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,944
8,906
One of the Feynman rules of QED is the following:

For a closed fermionic loop, the Feynman rule is to start at an arbitrary vertex or propagator, follow the line until we get back to the starting point, multiply all the vertices and the propagators in the order of the line, then take the trace of the matrix product. In addition, we include a negative sign for every closed fermionic loop.

For an open fermionic line, we must trace from the head of the line to the tail. In other words, we must start by writing down the polarization spinor for the line with outgoing charge, ..., and finally the polarization spinor for the line with the incoming charge.

Is there also a rule for closed fermionic loop that we must trace the loop in the direction opposite to the direction of the charge flow?
Yes, you always have to read the Feynman diagrams against the direction of the arrows. That's why it is most convenient to let run time from bottom to top of your page and then read the diagram from top to bottom. The additional sign in the closed loop comes from the fact that you have to reorder the fields to be contracted in Wick's theorem being on the ends of the expression to get a propagtor. Due to the fermion nature of the fields this reordering under the time-ordering symbol just gives an additional factor (-1) as mentioned in the fermion-loop Feynman rule.
 
  • #5
1,344
33
Yes, you always have to read the Feynman diagrams against the direction of the arrows. That's why it is most convenient to let run time from bottom to top of your page and then read the diagram from top to bottom. The additional sign in the closed loop comes from the fact that you have to reorder the fields to be contracted in Wick's theorem being on the ends of the expression to get a propagtor. Due to the fermion nature of the fields this reordering under the time-ordering symbol just gives an additional factor (-1) as mentioned in the fermion-loop Feynman rule.

Consider the following:

b4c95bcdda.png


Please ignore the fact that there are no polarization spinors and other junk. It's best if you concentrate on the trace.

I've written the gamma matrices in the direction of the arrows. Is this wrong?
 

Related Threads on Feynman rule for closed fermion loop in QED

  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
535
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
530
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
739
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
21
Views
931
  • Last Post
2
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
782
Top