Two Lorentz Boosts Causing Rotation - Measurable w/ Gyroscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ookke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentz Rotation
Ookke
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
It seems that combining two Lorentz boosts cause rotation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation#Composition_of_two_boosts

Do you think this rotation is something that could be measured by gyroscope? Or is it like space rotates around the accelerating observer, and the observer has no means to measure this rotation locally?

If I get this right, we could accelerate two observers differently so that they finally have the same velocity vector (and common rest frame), and their final orientation is not the same, although the initial orientation is. So the accelerations have somehow created a difference in orientation, but can we determine, which one of the observers has performed this rotation, or how this should be interpreted? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ookke said:
Do you think this rotation is something that could be measured by gyroscope?

Yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_precession

Ookke said:
So the accelerations have somehow created a difference in orientation, but can we determine, which one of the observers has performed this rotation, or how this should be interpreted?

Yes: just have each carry a gyroscope and see which one precesses relative to the distant stars, as well as by what angle, when they reconvene.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory
Ok, nice. But if no single boost causes any rotation, why would two boosts in a row do that? It's like space remembers that we already had boost in one direction, and when we have another, this mysterious Thomas rotation takes place.

Maybe I'm thinking this rotation too literally. Assuming that we have sensitive enought test equipment, should we detect us turning in a rocket that first uses its rear engine, then its side engine? At which point we should expect to detect this turning, if at all?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top