I see how the premises(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

p = \gamma m v

[/tex]

[tex]

F = \frac {dp}{dt}

[/tex]

and

[tex]

W= \int F dx

[/tex]

lead to

[tex]

dW = mc^2 d \gamma

[/tex]

and therefore

[tex]

W = \gamma mc^2 + k

[/tex]

where m is the rest mass and k is a constant of integration. But why do we conclude that k=0?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# About the mass-energy relation

Loading...

Similar Threads - mass energy relation | Date |
---|---|

I Mass/energy in general relativity | Jun 22, 2017 |

B Is the energy from the mass energy equivalence unbiased? | Feb 27, 2017 |

Rest, Mass, and Kinetic Energy | Oct 4, 2016 |

Mass-Energy Relation | Oct 4, 2015 |

Algebra in energy-momentum-mass relations | Jan 24, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**