About the semicondunctor quantum well

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wdlang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Quantum well
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of semiconductor quantum wells, specifically focusing on the GaAs-AlGaAs system. Participants explore the relative positions of the band gaps, the depth of the quantum well for electrons, and the factors influencing these properties, including material composition and temperature dependence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the precise position of the GaAs band gap relative to the AlGaAs band gap, noting that the properties of AlGaAs depend on the aluminum content.
  • It is mentioned that the band gap energy of GaAs is approximately 1.42 eV at room temperature, with significant temperature dependence.
  • Participants discuss the depth of the quantum well, suggesting it is influenced by the energy gap differences between the materials used and varies with temperature and composition.
  • One participant states that for a square well with x=0.3, the conduction band offset is roughly 330 meV, while for x around 0.1 to 0.15, it is about 150 meV.
  • There is a suggestion that the chemical potentials must be continuous across the junction in undoped samples.
  • References to external sources and literature are provided for further reading on band alignments and quantum well calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the specifics of the quantum well depth and the factors that influence it, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the exact nature of the quantum well properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the depth of the quantum well is not a singular value but rather depends on various factors, including material composition and temperature, which are not trivial to determine.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in semiconductor physics, particularly those exploring quantum well structures and their properties in relation to material composition and temperature effects.

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
consider the GaAs-AlGaAs semiconductor quantum well

the gap of GaAs is situated inside the AlGaAs gap

however, what is its precise position?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you mean by position of the gap?

If you mean the band gap energy of GaAs, it is about 1.42 eV at room temperature, but shows strong temperature dependence (have a look at the Ioffe semiconductor database if you want to know the exact numbers).

If you mean the position of the GaAs layer it is located wherever you grow it and as thick as you grow it.
 
Cthugha said:
What exactly do you mean by position of the gap?

If you mean the band gap energy of GaAs, it is about 1.42 eV at room temperature, but shows strong temperature dependence (have a look at the Ioffe semiconductor database if you want to know the exact numbers).

If you mean the position of the GaAs layer it is located wherever you grow it and as thick as you grow it.

i mean the relative positions of the two gaps

note that there are two materials and two gaps
 
I suppose you mean the band gap energies by "position".

That question cannot be answered in a general manner as AlGaAs is short for [tex]Al_XGa_{1-X}As[/tex]. The properties of AlGaAs depend strongly on the Aluminium content. The band gap at room temperature varies between the band gaps of pure GaAs at x=0 and pure AlAs at x=1, which are 1.42 and 2.16, respectively. Unfortunately the dependence is not linear and not trivial. Also, the nature of the band gap changes when increasing x. For x larger than roughly 0.4 the band gap becomes indirect for example. Both band gaps will of course also vary when the temperature is changed, so that the difference between the band gaps is also a non-trivial function of temperature and the Al-content.
 
Cthugha said:
I suppose you mean the band gap energies by "position".

That question cannot be answered in a general manner as AlGaAs is short for [tex]Al_XGa_{1-X}As[/tex]. The properties of AlGaAs depend strongly on the Aluminium content. The band gap at room temperature varies between the band gaps of pure GaAs at x=0 and pure AlAs at x=1, which are 1.42 and 2.16, respectively. Unfortunately the dependence is not linear and not trivial. Also, the nature of the band gap changes when increasing x. For x larger than roughly 0.4 the band gap becomes indirect for example. Both band gaps will of course also vary when the temperature is changed, so that the difference between the band gaps is also a non-trivial function of temperature and the Al-content.

you missed my question

i do not care the specific materials, i do not care the temperature dependence

the question comes from the quantum well

what is the depth of the quantum well for the electron?
 
The conduction band offset is roughly 330 meV, assuming an x ~ 0.3.
 
wdlang said:
you missed my question

i do not care the specific materials, i do not care the temperature dependence

the question comes from the quantum well

what is the depth of the quantum well for the electron?

Sigh, ok...you are new to this I assume...the depth of the quantum well is given by the energy gap (or conduction band) differences of the two materials used and therefore the well depth intrinsically depends on temperature and material composition. For square wells it is on the order of 330 meV for x=0.3 as LewisEE pointed out, it is about 150 meV for x around 0.1 to 0.15.

There is no "THE" depth of a quantum well.
 
Last edited:
In order to calculate quantum well depths, you have to know the band gaps and the band alignments. The band alignments are rather hard to come by from scratch, put typical values are published. For band alignments, I use the http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v39/i3/p1871_1" if you know the parameters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cthugha said:
Sigh, ok...you are new to this I assume...the depth of the quantum well is given by the energy gap (or conduction band) differences of the two materials used and therefore the well depth intrinsically depends on temperature and material composition. For square wells it is on the order of 330 meV for x=0.3 as LewisEE pointed out, it is about 150 meV for x around 0.1 to 0.15.

There is no "THE" depth of a quantum well.

but the principle is the chemical potentials are the same?
 
  • #10
chrisbaird said:
In order to calculate quantum well depths, you have to know the band gaps and the band alignments. The band alignments are rather hard to come by from scratch, put typical values are published. For band alignments, I use the http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v39/i3/p1871_1" if you know the parameters.

yes, i am absolutely new to this field

is there any good reference?

i guess the temperature dependence of the well depth comes from the temperature dependence of the chemical potentials. is that right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
wdlang said:
but the principle is the chemical potentials are the same?

Well, for undoped samples the chemical potential must be continuous across the junction.

wdlang said:
is there any good reference?

There is lot of stuff on several different levels of complexity. One might start from chapter 9 of "Fundamentals of Semiconductors" (2010 edition) by Cardona and Yu and follow the references therein if the treatment is too basic.
 
  • #12
wdlang said:
yes, i am absolutely new to this field

is there any good reference?

i guess the temperature dependence of the well depth comes from the temperature dependence of the chemical potentials. is that right?

To start, you can google "varshni bandgap model" or something similar and read the first few websites.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
952
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K