Absolute Hot - infographic on temperatures

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Hot
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the concept of "absolute hot" as depicted in an infographic shared on Dark Roasted Blend. Forum participants, particularly Dave, assert that the term "absolute hot" is misleading and equate it to the Planck temperature, which is not the highest temperature in physics. The conversation highlights the confusion surrounding scientific notation and the representation of extreme temperatures, including the coldest place in the universe located within our galaxy. The infographic, while visually interesting, contains inaccuracies that warrant reconsideration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck temperature and its significance in physics
  • Familiarity with Planck resistance and its implications
  • Basic knowledge of scientific notation and its use in scientific communication
  • Awareness of temperature extremes in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck temperature in theoretical physics
  • Explore the concept of Planck resistance and its relevance to electrical properties
  • Learn about the coldest known places in the universe and their characteristics
  • Investigate the use of scientific notation in communicating complex scientific ideas
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, science communicators, educators, and anyone interested in the nuances of temperature extremes and scientific terminology.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,258
Reaction score
8,385
Just stumbled across this on my favorite site Dark Roasted Blend:

I did not know there was an 'absolute hot'.

(it's too large to post here)
http://i.imgur.com/iHW7Dwh.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt, Andy Resnick, davenn and 2 others
Science news on Phys.org
Thanks Dave, interesting graphic :)

Dave
 
Well it may not be "absolute hot", but it sure is absolutely hot :w
 
Sadly, the notion of "absolute hot" is utter and complete nonsense. The Planck temperature is no more the highest temperature than the Planck resistance (30 ohms) is the highest (or would it be lowest?) resistance.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Sadly, the notion of "absolute hot" is utter and complete nonsense. The Planck temperature is no more the highest temperature than the Planck resistance (30 ohms) is the highest (or would it be lowest?) resistance.
Is the explanation wrong as well? That our physics models break down at that point?
 
Do our physics models break down at 30 ohms?
 
I don't know. I've never heard the Planck resistance, so I can't draw a correlation with the claim about the Planck temp.

But if the infographic is nonsense I should pull it down.
 
The only nonsenical part is the "absolute hot" part. (But that's the part that was, unfortunately, featured)
 
It is interesting to see a wide range of observed temperatures in one compilation.

Some other oversights:

Scientific notation is mostly avoided, presumably out of consideration for a lay audience, but is used when referring to the age of the universe in a couple of places.

The "coldest place in the Universe" occurs within our very own galaxy! What are the odds?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K