Absolute valuing both sides probably a big no-no in Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a set of inequalities with non-negative variables x, y, and z, and seeks to determine a constant K such that the absolute values of these variables are bounded by K. The context is rooted in mathematical reasoning related to inequalities and absolute values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding maximum values for x, y, and z based on the given inequalities. There are questions about the validity of taking absolute values of both sides of inequalities and the implications of the results. Some participants express uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the problem and the nature of the variable K.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the implications of the inequalities and the nature of the variable K. Some participants have provided insights into the limitations of manipulating inequalities, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the bounds of x, y, and z.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the problem statement, particularly regarding the use of the symbol K and the interpretation of the inequalities. There is also a side discussion about the relevance of certain inequalities and their implications for the values of the variables.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose you are given the following inequality

-6x+ 4y+ 10z \leq 1203
7y + 15z \leq 1551
x,y,z \geq 0

Find a K > 0, if it exists, such that |x| \leq K, |y| \leq K, |z| \leq K

Flyingpig's take on this



So I am just going find the max of each x,y,z

Let x = 0, y = 0

10z \leq 1203 \iff z \leq 120.3
15z \leq 1551 \iff z \leq 103.4

So it makes sense to take z \leq 103.4 and that |z| \leq 103.4

Let x = 0, z = 0

4y \leq 1203 \iff y \leq 300.75
7y \leq 1551 \iff y \leq 221.57

Take y \leq 221.57 and that |y| \leq 221.57

Let y = 0, z = 0

-6x \leq 1203 \iff x \geq -200.5
0 \leq 1551

However x \geq 0, so |x| \geq 0

Side Question - not part of this thread

Was 0 \leq 1551 useless? Also I know I am wrong, but I need to someone to give me a formal reason why I couldn't |x| \leq |-200.5| and it becomes that |x| \leq 200.5

Side Question - ended, carry on with calculation below

So we have

|x| \geq 0
|y| \leq 221.57
|z| \leq 103.4

Now what does |x| \geq 0 imply? Does it say that any K \geq 221.57 will satisfy the inequalities |x| \leq K, |y| \leq K, |z| \leq K
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find a K > 0, if it exists, such that |x| \leq K, |y| \leq K, |z| \leq K
Flyingpig said:
So we have

|x| \geq 0
|y| \leq 221.57
|z| \leq 103.4

I'm no expert here. But I wonder are you supposed to give this as the correct answer:

|x|,|y|,|z| <= 103.4
 
Regarding the side question: I don't know if this qualifies as a "formal" reason why you can't do it, but it's pretty clear that you can't just take the absolute value of both sides of the inequality, because in general the inequality doesn't hold true after such an operation.

For example, if you have a > b where a = 3 and b = -4, then clearly it's not true that |a| > |b|, since 3 is not greater than 4.
 
I would say the values for y and z are correct, but when the maximum possible values for y and z are plugged into the first equation, then x will need to be greater than (10z+4y-1203)/6
 
NascentOxygen said:
I'm no expert here. But I wonder are you supposed to give this as the correct answer:

|x|,|y|,|z| <= 103.4

Well no, x is unbounded. Isn't that the goal? Because if I go with your reasoning, then every unbounded set could be bounded by one K. K bounds the set/region

the word "set" and 'region" are the same here
 
I can't say what the goal is. But the question reads as "Find a K that satisfies these conditions ..." and it is unusual to reuse a symbol for different constants. I read "find a K" as singular.

Whatever was intended, I'd suggest the person who worded the question in this way and failed to see there may be an ambiguity should donate $25 to a charity of his choice. :smile:
 
NascentOxygen said:
I can't say what the goal is. But the question reads as "Find a K that satisfies these conditions ..." and it is unusual to reuse a symbol for different constants. I read "find a K" as singular.

Whatever was intended, I'd suggest the person who worded the question in this way and failed to see there may be an ambiguity should donate $25 to a charity of his choice. :smile:

Yeah I am sorry, this is part of another problem. I brought it into this context sorry. I originally had difficulty with solving for the inequalities
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K