I Absorption and emission spectroscopy of atoms

MartinG
Messages
27
Reaction score
4
Hello !

As I understand it, the different isotopes of the same atom have a slightly different spectroscopic absorption and emission where, for example, Deuterium absorbs slightly shorter wavelengths than Protium.

My question is if two isotopes of different atoms, for example Tritium and Helium 3, which have three nucleons in both atoms, the spectroscopic absorption and emission of the different Isotopes is the same or different?

I thank you in advance for your responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The primary interaction in an atom is Coulombic. The effects of the mass of the heavier nucleus is predominately to alter the "reduced mass" $$\mu=m_e\frac 1 {1+\frac {m_e} {m_{nucleus}}}$$This is small and easy.
The other effects, which change nucleic charge (and electron number), affect all aspects of the interaction and produce major changes to the calculation and its outcome
 
  • Like
Likes aaroman, Lord Jestocost, topsquark and 2 others
MartinG said:
My question is if two isotopes of different atoms, for example Tritium and Helium 3, which have three nucleons in both atoms, the spectroscopic absorption and emission of the different Isotopes is the same or different?
Very different.

Changing the number of protons and/or electrons in an atom will change it's coarse structure (at the level where even the Bohr model can predict a change). These changes are of order 0.1 - 1eV. Changing the number of neutrons in the nucleus changes the atom's spectrum at the hyperfine level (caused by magnetic interactions between the nuclear spin and the electrons' orbit and spin). These changes are at the level of 0.00001 - 0.0001 eV.
 
  • Like
Likes aaroman, topsquark and MartinG
Helium nuclei have twice the charge, which scales all energy levels with a factor 4. Instead of -13.6 eV the lowest energy state is now at about -54 eV. That's far more important than the relatively small isotope effect.
 
  • Like
Likes aaroman, MartinG and topsquark
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top