Absorption line spectra and emission line spectra

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between absorption and emission line spectra in atoms, exploring why these properties do not cancel each other out in observed spectral lines. Participants examine the mechanisms of photon absorption and emission, particularly in the context of dense gas clouds and specific atomic transitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why absorption and emission properties do not cancel out, suggesting that absorbed photons should lead to corresponding emitted photons.
  • Another participant describes a scenario involving a dense gas cloud that absorbs resonance photons, leading to non-radiative energy loss through collisions, which affects the observed spectral lines.
  • A participant shares an observation of sodium D-lines, noting that cooler sodium gas absorbs emission lines, resulting in a narrow absorption notch in the observed spectrum.
  • It is mentioned that measuring an emission spectrum typically requires positioning the detector at a 90-degree angle to avoid detecting re-emitted photons directly.
  • Further inquiry is made about the effects of detector positioning on absorption lines, questioning whether they would be reduced if the detector were placed directly in line with the source.
  • There is speculation about the randomness of emission direction following photon absorption, with a comparison made to the behavior of photons reflecting off a mirror.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the interaction between absorption and emission spectra, with some agreeing on specific observations while others raise questions and propose alternative scenarios. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall relationship between these phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific atomic transitions and experimental setups, indicating that the discussion is limited by the assumptions made about the conditions under which absorption and emission occur. There is also a lack of consensus on the implications of detector positioning and the nature of emitted photon directions.

Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Why don’t emission and absorption properties of an atom cancel out such that no such spectral lines are seen.

If electrons in atoms are excited from level 1 to level 2 and absorb energy at some specific frequency, why don’t they then emit that same frequency when they fall back down to level1 and cancel out the absorption lines with the emission lines.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine a dense gas cloud. You look at a star through it. The resonance photons are obsorbed in the gas and then the excited atoms/molecules collide and transform the excitation energy into heat. Then the cloud will absorb this spectral line.

If there is no non-radiative loss mechanisme, then the cloud will diffuse the absorbed light to all directions which is somewhat similar to partial absorption.
 
Hi Zman-
I have looked at the sodium doublet (yellow)D-lines with a ruled grating spectrometer. The sodium arc is a lot hotter than the surrounding cool sodium gas. The cooler gas absorbs the emission lines in the center of each sodium line, so that the resultant sodium D-lines each have a narrow absorpton notch in the center.
Bob S
 
A valid question. In many cases they would, although it depends on what transition you're talking about, but anyhow.. In general, if you want to measure an emission spectrum, you do so at a 90 degree angle from your excitation source, so that those photons don't enter your detector. The re-emitted photons go in all directions.
 
Thank you for your helpful responses.

alxm said:
In general, if you want to measure an emission spectrum, you do so at a 90 degree angle from your excitation source, so that those photons don't enter your detector. The re-emitted photons go in all directions.

What would you see if placed the detector head on instead of 90 degrees.
Would the absorption lines just be reduced?



If a photon is absorbed by an atom, presumably the direction of the subsequent emission is not necessarily related to the original direction of the photon.
Is this emission direction random or maybe even like a diffraction pattern?
It would make sense that it was something like this from what has been said. The absorption spectra would seem to require it.

And yet with a mirror the incident direction of the photon is related to the emission direction of the photon. But presumably the photons here are not being absorbed and there is a different rule at work.
 
Zman said:
What would you see if placed the detector head on instead of 90 degrees.
Would the absorption lines just be reduced?.
Hi Zman-
If the absorber were placed directly in between the (thermally hotter) source and the (colder) absorber, you would see a dark band in middle of the source emission line(s). It is very educational to look at the sodium D lines (about 5880 Angstroms) with a diffraction grating. You will see the two 3P to 3S lines, each with a dark absorptin band in the middle.
Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K