Abstract algebra: Rings and Ideals

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that a subset A of a ring S, defined as a Cartesian product of two rings, is an ideal based on certain properties. The original poster has established that A is a subring of S and has proven one direction of the ideal definition, but faces challenges with the requirement to show that R is commutative, given that R is a ring without zero divisors and without an identity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the definition of commutativity in the context of R being a ring without zero divisors and without an identity. Other participants question whether such a ring can be commutative and discuss the implications of R's lack of identity.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the properties of rings without zero divisors and identity, with some suggesting that such rings may not be commutative. There is an ongoing examination of definitions and properties related to integral domains and the implications of R's characteristics.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted constraint regarding the properties of R, specifically its lack of identity, which influences the discussion about its commutativity and classification as an integral domain.

lmedin02
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is to show that a subset A of a ring S is an ideal where A has certain properties. S is a ring described as a cartisian product of two other rings (i.e., S=(RxZ,+,*)). I have already proved that A is a subring of S and proved one direction of the definition of an ideal. But, the other direction has brought me to having to show that R is commutative. It is given that R is a ring without zero divisors and without identity.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that a ring R is commutative if it has the property that ab=ca implies b=c when a is not zero. I have attempted various simple manipulations of this statement by using the fact that R is a ring without zero divisors and without an identity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In other words, is a ring R without zero divisors and without an identity commutative.
 
An integral domain has a unity (i.e., identity). In my case, R has no unity so it is not an integral domain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K