B Accelerating Universe Expansion: Age & Hubble Constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the accelerating expansion of the universe and the Hubble Constant, emphasizing that the universe's age is fixed despite changes in the rate of expansion. It critiques the assumptions made in the referenced article, stating they do not align with the Lambda-CDM model, particularly regarding the use of a simple power law for energy components. The current balance of matter and the cosmological constant complicates the application of this model. Furthermore, the estimation of the universe's age relies heavily on the cosmological framework. Due to the reliance on an unacceptable reference, the discussion thread has been closed.
Mike holden
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How the age of the Universe depends on the rate of acceleration.
In my article - The accelerating expansion of the Universe at:
[Unacceptable reference delted by the Mentors]
I discuss how the age of the Universe depends on the rate of acceleration, the common factor being the value of the Hubble Constant at the present time. I go on to show how the expansion progresses in the future for each scenario.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
Mike holden said:
age of the Universe depends on the rate of acceleration
The age of the universe is what it is. It doesn't get older because the rate changes, although the rate may change as it gets older.
 
The article makes fundamental assumptions that are not in accordance with the Lambda-CDM model. Assuming a simple power law is fine if you only have a single type of energy component in the Universe, but then the exponent will depend on the equation of state parameter of that component. In the current Universe, matter and the cosmological constant are of similar energy density and this means the simple power law is not a good description.

In addition, the estimate for the age of the Universe is based upon the cosmological model.
 
Since the thread start was based on an unacceptable reference, the thread is closed.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top