Acceleration and roller coaster question that I cannot figure out

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the application of physics equations related to acceleration and roller coasters. Participants emphasize the necessity of posting relevant equations and attempted solutions to facilitate effective assistance. Key equations mentioned include work (w = f × d) and potential energy (EP = mgh), though the latter was questioned for clarity. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the transition from potential to kinetic energy as a roller coaster descends.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, including potential and kinetic energy.
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle, specifically the equation w = f × d.
  • Knowledge of the PF LaTeX feature for formatting equations in forum posts.
  • Ability to analyze motion and energy transformations in mechanical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the work-energy theorem and its applications in physics problems.
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in roller coaster dynamics.
  • Learn how to effectively use LaTeX for formatting equations in online discussions.
  • Explore examples of potential energy conversion to kinetic energy in real-world scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of roller coasters and energy transformations in motion.

kevin2365
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
i need some help with these two questions I cannot figure out the equations especially for the second one if anyone could help that would be great, thanks

1. A 65.0 kg rock is moved 12.0 m across a frozen
lake. If it is accelerated at a constant rate of 0.561 m/s^2 and the force of friction is ignored, calculate the work done.

2A roller coaster at a popular amusement park has a portion of the track that is similar to the diagram provided. Assuming that the roller coaster is frictionless, find its speed at the top of the loop.
the picture is posted for this one as well as well.
Relevant Equations
some of the equations i have tried to use but don't quite work are EP=mpg as as well as w=fxd
Screen Shot 2020-04-23 at 3.31.04 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This forum doesn't work like this: you post the problem, some guy/gal posts the solution.
You have to give your thought on how to solve them, what equations you can find useful.
So do this, or this post will get locked (or maybe even deleted) by moderators.
 
the issue is that I'm really confused with these two questions and I'm not sure how to solve them that's why I'm looking for some help.
 
kevin2365 said:
the issue is that I'm really confused with these two questions and I'm not sure how to solve them that's why I'm looking for some help.

Per the PF rules, you need to at least post the equations you think are relevant and your attempt at a solution.
 
dextercioby said:
This forum doesn't work like this: you post the problem, some guy/gal posts the solution.
You have to give your thought on how to solve them, what equations you can find useful.
So do this, or this post will get locked (or maybe even deleted) by moderators.
i have added some of the equations that I have attempted to use but they don't work because none of them have anything to do with acceleration
 
kevin2365 said:
i have added some of the equations that I have attempted to use

Please use the PF LaTeX feature for equations. You can find a "LaTeX Guide" link at the bottom left of the edit window for posts.

kevin2365 said:
Relevant Equations:: some of the equations i have tried to use but don't quite work are EP=mpg as as well as w=fxd

I don't know what EP=mpg means. I assume w=fxd means work equals force times distance; generally there is no need to explicitly include a symbol for multiplication.

Why do you think work = force times distance doesn't quite work? What have you tried to do with it?
 
nevermind for the first question i figured it out
 
kevin2365 said:
nevermind for the first question i figured it out

Ok, what about relevant equations and an attempt at a solution for the second part?
 
Notice at t1 the car is at rest ie it has v0=0 and it has potential energy.

what happens at t2? it is lower and now has some kinetic energy.

where did the kinetic energy come from?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
866
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K