Acceleration as a function of position, and velocity.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on expressing velocity as a function of position when acceleration is defined as a function of position, specifically in the context of classical mechanics. The equation F = kx = ma is referenced, leading to the conclusion that if acceleration a = (k/m)x and initial velocity v0 is known, velocity can indeed be expressed as a function of position without requiring a time variable. The integration of acceleration with respect to position, using the chain rule, allows for the derivation of velocity as v(x) through conservation of energy principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles, particularly Newton's laws.
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration and differentiation.
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus.
  • Concept of conservation of energy in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in physics problems.
  • Explore conservation of energy and its implications in mechanical systems.
  • Learn about integrating functions in calculus, focusing on physical applications.
  • Investigate the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in various contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in advanced mechanics and the mathematical relationships between acceleration, velocity, and position.

Axecutioner
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
If acceleration is a function of position, can you express velocity as a function of position, or would there have to be a time variable? For example, if F = kx = ma, and v0 is given, then a = (k/m)x, so what would the function for v be?

I would think that, if you know the acceleration at every point along a given path and you know initial velocity, you would also know velocity at every point as well, without having to know what time is.

My actual problem is more complicated than a spring, but it comes down to ∫ f(x) d? = ∫ a d? = v, but what would the integral be? dx or dt?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can do this. For example you can use the chain rule

dv/dt = (dv/dx)(dx/dt)

but dx/dt = v, so

a = dv/dt = v dv/dx.
 
Axecutioner said:
I would think that, if you know the acceleration at every point along a given path and you know initial velocity, you would also know velocity at every point as well, without having to know what time is.
That's correct, if you take what AlephZero said, and write it as 0.5*d(v2)/dx = F(x), then integrate over x, you get the concept of kinetic energy on the RHS and potential energy on the LHS, which let's you figure out v(x) without ever knowing t.
My actual problem is more complicated than a spring, but it comes down to ∫ f(x) d? = ∫ a d? = v, but what would the integral be? dx or dt?
It's over dt, to get the second integral to =v. But it's not useful, since F is a function of x not t. So get v(x) with conservation of energy, and if you want to know what t is doing, say v(x)=dx/dt so t is the integral of dx/v(x).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K