Acceleration of a cart being pulled by a falling mass

Click For Summary
A cart on a table is connected to a falling mass via a pulley, causing it to accelerate as the mass descends. The experiment involves varying the mass of the falling object and the mass added to the cart across four trials. The calculated pulling force and theoretical acceleration are discussed, highlighting the importance of considering the total mass of the system. The participant realizes that the net force should be divided by the total mass for accurate acceleration calculations. The graphing approach is clarified, leading to a successful plot of net force versus acceleration.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I'm doing a lab and getting very confused.

A cart is on a table. It is attached to a string which goes over a pulley. The pulley is on the edge of the table.

On the end of the string there is a mass. When the mass falls straight down, it pulls on the string and makes the cart accelerate too.

Homework Equations


Mass of the cart = 1 kg (constant)
Trial 1: mass falling down: 0.1 kg & mass added to cart: 0.4 kg
Trial 2: mass falling down: 0.2 kg & mass added to cart: 0.3 kg
Trial 3: mass falling down: 0.3 kg & mass added to cart: 0.2 kg
Trial 4: mass falling down: 0.4 kg & mass added to cart: 0.1 kg

The Attempt at a Solution


I am supposed to graph the acceleration of the cart vs. the pulling force. However, I am not sure what this graph should look like.

For trial 1, the pulling force would be (0.1 kg)*(9.81 m/s2)=0.981 N, right? And the theoretical acceleration would be 0.981 N/(0.4 kg+1kg) = 1.962 m/s2.

However, if I graph a vs. F, I don't get a straight line, because the mass of the moving object is always changing. Is this right? In the book they make a big deal about the total mass of the system being constant, so I'm wondering if that has something to do with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The big deal is not for nothing: it is not only the cart that accelerates, the pulling mass doesn't stay in the same place either! In fact it accelerates just as fast as the cart. And that requires some force too!
[edit] but I see you correctly take that into consideration.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Out of curiosity: what is being measured and how do you process the measurements to get a plot? Can you show the plot(s) you have so far ?
 
Thank you! I'm not sure what I was thinking. It makes much more sense to divide by the total mass. I did take it into consideration but then forgot to include in in my calculation.

Basically I just found the net force for each trial based on the weight of the falling mass. Then, I calculated the acceleration of the cart using a spark timer. I put the net force on the y-axis and the acceleration on the x, which gives a slope of m (total mass).

Unfortunately I did the plot by hand and I don't have a scanner handy, but it seems to be working out now. Thanks a ton for your help, much appreciated!
 
More than welcome. Good luck further on!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K