Acceleration Problem: Solve for U & A

  • Thread starter Thread starter kazuya99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a free-falling object using the formula s = ut + 1/2at². The parameters provided include a distance from the gate of 0.02m, a time of 0.163 seconds, and a card length (S) of 0.1m. The user presumes the initial velocity (U) to be 0, which is a critical assumption for the calculation. The impact of air resistance on lighter objects is noted, indicating that results may vary based on the object's mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically s = ut + 1/2at²
  • Basic knowledge of free fall physics
  • Familiarity with measuring time and distance in experiments
  • Concept of air resistance and its effects on motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of air resistance on free-falling objects
  • Learn how to accurately measure acceleration using different masses
  • Explore advanced kinematic equations for varying initial velocities
  • Study the principles of free fall in different mediums (e.g., vacuum vs. air)
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of free fall and acceleration calculations.

kazuya99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have been given a set of results to analyse, regarding acceleration of a free fall object in a piece of paper, (100g mass, 10cm card) falling through a light gate at different heights, i am having problems with working out the acceleration using formulae.
Distance from gate = 0.02m
Time = 0.163 seconds.
U = 0 i presume..or maybe not(part of my problem)
S = 0.1 (the length of the card)


Homework Equations


s = ut + 1/2at(squared)


The Attempt at a Solution


I have got 9.15 once but i think it was a coincedence.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the lighter objects, you have to take the air resisatance into account. The answer you got correct, would probably have been for a heavier object cause the air resistance is negligible for them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K