Acceleration & velocity using instantaneous centre of zero velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity and acceleration of bearing B and the angular properties of link AB, given specific dimensions and the constant upward velocity of bearing A. Initial calculations indicated that the angular velocity of link AB is 2 rad/s, leading to a velocity of bearing B calculated as 0.38 m/s. Participants express confusion regarding the acceleration of bearing B and the angular acceleration of link AB, with some questioning the interpretation of the "center of zero velocity." The need for clarity in the relationships between the components and the correct application of Pythagorean theorem in the context of the problem is emphasized. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in understanding instantaneous centers of motion in mechanical systems.
Ctom101
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. A link is connected by two bearings A and B. The bearings run along slots which are at right angles to each other. The length of the link AB (length between the centres of bearings A and B) is 0.2m. At an instant of time, height H, is 0.05m, and the bearing A has a constant velocity V, of 0.1m/s upwards.
At the instant of time calculate;
The velocity of bearing B.
The angular velocity of the link AB.
The acceleration of bearing B.
The angular acceleration of the link AB


2. velocity B = distance from rotational centre x angular velocity of link AB.
angular velocity of link AB = velocity A / distance from centre of zero velocity

3. from the working out in my picture changing it into a triangle I think I have worked out the velocity of bearing B and the angular velocity of link AB, but I don't know how to find the acceleration of B or the angular acceleration of AB.
Could somebody please help me with this and let me know if what I've done so far is incorrect?

The Attempt at a Solution


a = 0.05 c = 0.2
a2 + b2 = c2
0.22 / 0.052 = 16 root 16 = 4 b = 4
velocity A / distance from centre of zero velocity
0.1 / 0.05 = 2rad/s angular velocity of link AB
velocity B = distance from rotational centre(b) x angular velocity link AB
4 x 2 = 8m/s

ωv AB = 2rad/s
v B = 8m/s
 

Attachments

  • bearings slot diagram.png
    bearings slot diagram.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 829
  • workings.png
    workings.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 733
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to exploit the relationship between A and B ... i.e. the dimensions of the triangle.
I don't understand your working though.

If I put c=|AB|, with the position of B as x and the position of A as y, then

c^2=x^2+y^2

...differentiate through by time to get the relationship between the velocities, and again to get the accelerations.
what is the acceleration of A?
 
It says A has a constant velocity of 0.1m/s, so I think acceleration is 0

Looking over it again I think I worked out the length b incorrectly.

link AB = 0.2m
Height = 0.05m

Pythagoras: a^2 + b^2 = c^2

link AB = c
Height = a

c^2 - a^2 = b^2

0.2^2 - 0.05^ = 0.0375
root 0.0375 = 0.1936
b = 0.19
 
angular velocity of link AB = velocity A / distance from centre of zero velocity

velocity A = 0.1m/s
distance from centre of zero velocity (a) = 0.05m
0.1/0.05= 2rad/s

velocity B = distance from centre of zero velocity x angular velocity of link AB

angular velocity of AB = 2rad/s
distance from centre of zero velocity (b) = 0.19

0.19 x 2 = 0.38m/s
velocity B = 0.38m/s

I think this is now right but I don't know how to move on for;
The acceleration of bearing B.
The angular acceleration of the link AB
 
I still don't see how your reasoning arrives at the required quantities.

What does "center of zero velocity" mean?
You seem to be giving the velocity of A in radiens per second as if it were moving perpendicular to the corner.
Is this correct?

What's wrong with the suggestions I already gave you?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K