Accessing LHC Data - Best Ways to Monitor Experiments

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kempo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Lhc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the best ways to monitor experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the accessibility of data to the public. Participants explore resources for tracking experiments, the nature of data available, and the conditions under which raw data might be accessed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses excitement about the upcoming beam circulation and collisions, seeking advice on monitoring experiments and understanding available data resources.
  • Another participant doubts that raw data will be made available to the public, explaining that detectors filter and reconstruct data before it reaches physicists.
  • A participant mentions the existence of a datacentre for LHC data, indicating the complexity and scale of data management.
  • It is noted that access to raw data is typically restricted to collaborators who contribute to the experiments, such as through calibration or software development.
  • One participant recalls a past situation where theorists requested raw data from Tevatron experiments, highlighting the logistical and financial challenges associated with data access.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that access to raw data is limited to collaborators and that public availability is unlikely. However, there is uncertainty regarding the specifics of data release policies and the timeline for when any interesting data might be accessible.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on what constitutes "raw" data and the dependence on collaboration for data access. The discussion does not resolve the timeline for data release or the specifics of data management practices at CERN.

kempo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Chaps,

As I'm sure we all are, I'm literally jumping up and down with excitement about next weeks first beam circulation - and only 31 days till the first collisions!

Obviously, the CERN / LHC website is a great resource, but to someone who is still finding their feet in the particle physics - what would people say is the best way of monitoring the different experiments? There seems to be lots of charts and data, but I'm struggling to work out what, if any of it, is "live" and what is already decommisioned or irrelevant. I'm looking at a few places, in particular:

http://lhc-operation.web.cern.ch/lhc-operation/Default.htm"
http://ab-dep-op.web.cern.ch/ab-dep-op/vistar.php?usr=LHC"

Also, does anyone know what CERN's intentions are on releasing data to the public? I'd love to get some mitts on some raw numbers, not that i'd really know what to do with them...

Thanks very much,

Kempo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I very much doubt that raw data will be distributed to the general public. Of course, it depends on what you mean by "raw" also: firstly, the detectors are computers which decide which data is important in real time. This data then gets sent to another computer which "reconstructs" interesting events before the physicists ever get to see anything. It's done this way because, if it weren't, there would be literally too much data for even a computer to digest. Then, I presume the data will go to CERN, who will then choose what they wish to release. I can't see this happening for quite a while, though.

So, whilst I understand you're excited for the first collisions in just over a month, nothing "interesting" will really happen for quite a long time after that!
 
yeah fair point... I was reading the other day about the datacentre they've built for it which is mind-blowing in itself.

I guess it's just a case of sticking to the press releases and the papers. I'm just impatient.

Many thanks

kempo
 
Unless you are a collaborator, you don't have access to raw data. Being a collaborator implies contributing, like calibrating a detector or writing a piece of useful software. Now, that applies to a team of people, so some students will indeed only see raw data analysis but they are part of a larger group, itself part of the collaboration.
 
Humanino is right. The way it works is that if you want access to the data, you need to make a contribution.

A while back, a number of theorists were clamoring to have the Tevatron experiments release their raw data, and a few of the more excitable ones even started making sounds like "Freedom of Information Act". At one point, the experiments said something like "If you really want a copy, we'll make you one - but you have to provide the blank media and pay the overtime for the computer operators to copy it." This would run into millions and probably tens of millions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K