Achieving the speed of light at the end of a whip

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical possibility of a whip's tip reaching the speed of light. Participants concluded that, according to the laws of relativistic mechanics, no object, including a whip, can achieve light speed due to the requirement of infinite energy. The whip's tip must reach twice the speed of sound to produce a crack, which is a sonic boom, but this is far from light speed. The conversation also touches on the implications of energy and mass in relation to speed, emphasizing that even hypothetical materials cannot overcome these fundamental physics principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic mechanics
  • Knowledge of sound speed and sonic booms
  • Familiarity with Newtonian physics
  • Basic concepts of energy and mass relationship
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of relativistic mechanics
  • Study the physics of sound and the conditions for producing sonic booms
  • Explore Newtonian equations and their limitations in high-speed scenarios
  • Investigate the relationship between energy input and mass in physical objects
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, students exploring relativistic mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of wave propagation and energy transfer in physical objects.

idktbh1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is there a equation for the speed at the end of the whip.
is there a consistent way to calculate how fast the tip of the whip will be including constant velocity and trajectory or is it chaotic.
Im new to physics and had a thought that with enough legnth and power a wiphs end colud reach the speed of light without using infinite energy... i don't know if that's the case . I am very invested in this any help wolud be appreciated!My logic is that we use little energy to brake the sound barrier with a whip that it colud be possible to reach the speed of light.
The material of the whip is not a factor. Its ruled out because no material can withstand the speed of light and bend like a whip.
Im just looking for theroetical evidance for this!
 
Science news on Phys.org
The end of an object is accelerated by the part of the object next to it. If you focus on the end of a whip, its motion is governed by the laws of relativistic mechanics and cannot achieve the speed of light. There is no fundamental difference between the end of a whip and any other object.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: idktbh1
PeroK said:
The end of an object is accelerated by the part of the object next to it. If you focus on the end of a whip, its motion is governed by the laws of relativistic mechanics and cannot achieve the speed of light. There is no fundamental difference between the end of a whip and any other object.
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
 
idktbh1 said:
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
All is not lost. There is still some hope.
When a wavefront crosses or is reflected by a line, the locus of the point of contact of wavefront and line, moves at a speed between that of the wavefront and infinity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave#Phase_velocity
"The superluminal phase velocity does not violate special relativity, because phase propagation carries no energy".
 
Just for info, the material at the end of the whip needs to reach twice the speed of sound in order for the 'crack' to occur.
PeroK's reply is accurate. Even given a hypothetical material of infinite strength (something physics forbids), no amount of energy could move any part of it locally at light speed. I say locally because plenty of things move faster than light non-locally. A neutrino passes between Alpha-Centauri and here at possibly faster than light as measured by either us or them, but not as measured by something in the current proximity of the neutrino. The difference is that we're all using different clocks that run at different rates due to differences in the gravitational potential of each observation point.

So with enough energy and a deep enough gravity well for your observation point (lawn-chair on a neutron star seems like a good spot, don't forget the ice tea), the speed of the whip tip can indeed exceed c, but will still not outpace nearby light moving in the same direction.
 
idktbh1 said:
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
Finding out news things shouldn't be 'demotivating'. Science is a journey, littered with occasions when one finds out one is wrong. Accepting that you need to modify your view according to evidence is healthy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27 and phinds
idktbh1 said:
The material of the whip is not a factor. Its ruled out because no material can withstand the speed of light and bend like a whip.
Mass'y material can't do light speed.
idktbh1 said:
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
Better now than when you've spent a fortune trying to develop a whip that can't work.

Also : spellcheck, spellcheck, spellcheck, spellcheck...

Halc said:
Just for info, the material at the end of the whip needs to reach twice the speed of sound in order for the 'crack' to occur.

Don't leave us hanging... why ?
 
hmmm27 said:
Halc said:
Just for info, the material at the end of the whip needs to reach twice the speed of sound in order for the 'crack' to occur.
Don't leave us hanging... why ?
The technique seems to be to form a loop in the whip and propagate that down the ever-thinning length of the thing. So conservation of energy and momentum has the loop 'wave' moving faster and faster as the mass density of the whip goes down towards the end. The tiny sonic boom occurs if the loop can be made to move at supersonic speeds. Since it is a loop, the top of it moves at twice the speed just like the top of the wheel of a car moves at twice the speed of the car. A car does not make a sonic boom at 650 km/hr even though the top of its wheels are moving at supersonic speeds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27
Now I am wondering if the ritual of snapping of towels in the gym was producing a sonic boom.
There was evidently no loop in the towel.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #10
256bits said:
Now I am wondering if the ritual of snapping of towels in the gym was producing a sonic boom.
There was evidently no loop in the towel.
"Evidently"? You would need a slomo camera, close up, to observe the shape at the end of a towel. Afair, the effect was best with the towel operated 'diagonally', with a corner at the end; ideal for producing a small loop and a high speed. Ahhh those were the days.

EDIT: PS, I just remembered the same sort of horseplay with my sons in the kitchen when they should have been drying dishes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
  • #11
sophiecentaur said:
"Evidently"?
Not the same type of loop as the 'one coil loop' ( it is kind of like a twist was put into the whip somehow ) that travels down the bullwhip that they use to analyse the bullwhip - not sure if every bullwhip user produces that type, but they ( who is they ? and why ) presume so.

The towel loop would not have that type of coil - it would be simply a halved towel where one end unfurls, and the tip of that end accelerates and the length common to the tip shortens.
 
  • #12
So if Indiana Jones is standing on top of a train moving at 0.999999999999999999999C, calculate the gamma factors along the length of his whip from the frame of reference of his intended target bad guy standing beside the track

(actually please don't)
 
  • #13
256bits said:
Not the same type of loop as the 'one coil loop' ( it is kind of like a twist was put into the whip somehow ) that travels down the bullwhip that they use to analyse the bullwhip - not sure if every bullwhip user produces that type, but they ( who is they ? and why ) presume so.

The towel loop would not have that type of coil - it would be simply a halved towel where one end unfurls, and the tip of that end accelerates and the length common to the tip shortens.
I made an assumption that the shape of the wave traveling along the whip / towel would be a simple transverse semi-loop (U shape). If anything else was meant then I would have expected a diagram as explanation. A photo image of that would constitute evidence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits and hmmm27
  • #15
idktbh1 said:
Is there a equation for the speed at the end of the whip?

If such an equation exists, it would likely be Newtonian and ignore relativity. Getting a whip to move fast enough that relativity becomes relevant sounds... unlikely. Putting big numbers into a Newtonian equation might produce an answer faster than light. But as others here have said, what would really happen is that the energy you put into the whip would just go into making it's effective mass higher, and then tearing the whip apart.
 
  • #16
Nice video of a whip in slow motion :
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jrmichler and hmmm27

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
15K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
28K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K