Achieving speed of light via rotation on an axle?

In summary, the video demonstrates that it is physically possible to achieve a velocity of c, or 299,792,458 meters per second, by accelerating something tangentially. However, the magnitude of the G-force experienced by the object would be so great that it would most likely cause it to fly apart before you could achieve a velocity that approached a miniscule fraction of c.
  • #1
awiltz2
1
0
I was reading about dentist drills, and I discovered an amazing piece of trivia about them: modern dentist drills spin at 400,000 revolutions per minute (over 6666 times per second!).

So I thought, if this was spinning a large wheel, whose outer rim would rotate at a rate progressively faster than the inner rims, could it ever achieve the speed of light? Technically, I know that the speed of light (c) is a physical limit, but what would happen to such a physical device?

So you have an axle run by a powerful motor that rotates the wheel it is attached to at a rate of 6666 revolutions per second (speed of dentist drill).

Speed of light (c) is ~300,000,000 meters per second. At 6666rpm, to achieve the speed of light we would need a wheel whose circumference is (300,000,000 / 6666) 45,000 meters, which would equate to a diameter of (45,000 / pi) 14,324 meters - roughly 9 miles.

So we create a structurally-sound, 9-mile-wide wheel and rotate it on an axle, slowly but surely until we achieve 6666rpm.

To run the motor would require an almost unimaginable amount of energy (I reckon), and to find enough material to create a wheel that is structurally sound enough to not fall apart in the process would most likely be inconceivable, but ...

If we could capture enough energy, and obtain the necessary materials, could this work? If not, why not? Something tells me that the laws of physics somehow prevent the physical integrity necessary for such a wheel, but this is simply a guess.


Andrew
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well...if you understand that C is a physical limit (and you understand why?), why would it matter if you attempted to reach it with linear or rotational acceleration?
 
  • #3
Because you will need an infinite energy... and there's no "enough" energy that is infinite!

The point is that as the speed of your wheel (or anything else) approaches C, to bring this speed to C you will need E->infinite. So, if you are a genius with a lot of money buy your wheel or create it, but don't say I Had not told you!


C.
 
  • #4
Greetings Andrew,

Even if it were possible to provide enough energy to force a large wheel to achieve a tangential velocity of light-speed, c, (299,792,458 m/s) and assuming light-speed were actually physically achievable; the G-force experienced by the wheel would be colossal and cause it to fly apart long before you could achieve a velocity that approached a miniscule fraction of c.

The acceleration (a) experienced at a given tangential velocity (v) by whatever mass per the radius (r) of the wheel can be derived by the following kinematics equation:

a = (v)^2 / r

Let’s assume it’s a huge wheel with a radius (r) of 100 meters and we would like to spin it at a velocity (v) of c:

(299,792,458 m/s)^2 / 100 meters = 8.987551787e+14 m/s^2

As you can see, the acceleration (a) is nothing short of colossal and nothing could withstand the G-force per any building materials known by man.

I hope you found this helpful.
 
  • #5
Whether you're accelerating something tangentially or linearly, as it's velocity (linear or tangential) approaches light speed, it's mass will still begin to approach infinity. And even if it didn't, like Gnosis said, we don't have any materials that wouldn't simply be ripped apart by the magnitude of force necessary to spin something that fast.
 
  • #6
I posed this question many years ago on a filesharing forum I used to frequent (for a long time I refused to believe that nothing could travel faster than light) convinced I had artfully smashed the cosmic speed limit via a crude thought experiment involving a huge pole stuck to a spinning wheel or something. A wise (if a little sarcastic) fellow forum goer simply linked me something along the lines of this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmRV8wNJdKY&feature=related

not massively helpful I know, but I enjoyed the visual aid.
 
  • #7
Lol that video was awesome!
 

1. What is the concept behind achieving the speed of light via rotation on an axle?

The concept is based on Einstein's theory of relativity, which states that as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases and time slows down. By rotating an object on an axle at extremely high speeds, we can achieve a similar effect and approach the speed of light without having to physically accelerate the object itself.

2. Is it actually possible to achieve the speed of light with this method?

Theoretically, yes. However, it would require an incredibly large amount of energy and a perfectly balanced and sturdy axle to rotate the object at such high speeds. So while it is possible in theory, it is currently not feasible with our current technology.

3. What would happen to an object rotating at the speed of light on an axle?

At the speed of light, an object's mass would become infinite and time would essentially stop for the object. It would also experience extreme forces due to the rotation, potentially causing it to disintegrate. This is why achieving the speed of light via rotation on an axle is not currently possible.

4. Are there any other potential applications for this concept besides achieving the speed of light?

Some scientists have proposed using this concept to create artificial black holes for studying the effects of extreme gravity. It could also potentially be used in space travel, as an alternative to traditional forms of propulsion.

5. What are the potential implications of achieving the speed of light through rotation on an axle?

If we were able to achieve the speed of light with this method, it would completely change our understanding of space and time. It could also have significant implications for space travel and could potentially open up new possibilities for exploring the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
761
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Optics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top