Achieving speed of light via rotation on an axle?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of achieving the speed of light through the rotation of a large wheel on an axle, inspired by the high rotational speeds of dentist drills. Participants explore the implications of such a scenario, including energy requirements, structural integrity, and the physical limits imposed by the laws of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if a wheel could be spun at 6666 revolutions per second, it would need to be 9 miles in diameter to achieve the speed of light, raising questions about the energy and materials required.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of the method of acceleration (linear vs. rotational) when approaching the speed of light, implying that the physical limit remains unchanged.
  • It is noted that achieving light speed would require infinite energy, which is not feasible, as stated by one participant.
  • A participant discusses the immense G-forces that would be experienced by the wheel, suggesting that no known materials could withstand the forces involved at such high speeds.
  • Another participant reinforces the idea that as an object's speed approaches light speed, its mass would also approach infinity, complicating the feasibility of such a scenario.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about a previous discussion on the topic, referencing a video that provided a visual aid but did not contribute significantly to the argument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the laws of physics impose significant limitations on the idea of achieving light speed through rotation, with multiple competing views on the implications of energy requirements and material integrity. The discussion remains unresolved regarding any potential methods to overcome these challenges.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the structural integrity of materials at extreme speeds and the energy requirements necessary to approach light speed, highlighting the dependence on theoretical assumptions about physics.

awiltz2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was reading about dentist drills, and I discovered an amazing piece of trivia about them: modern dentist drills spin at 400,000 revolutions per minute (over 6666 times per second!).

So I thought, if this was spinning a large wheel, whose outer rim would rotate at a rate progressively faster than the inner rims, could it ever achieve the speed of light? Technically, I know that the speed of light (c) is a physical limit, but what would happen to such a physical device?

So you have an axle run by a powerful motor that rotates the wheel it is attached to at a rate of 6666 revolutions per second (speed of dentist drill).

Speed of light (c) is ~300,000,000 meters per second. At 6666rpm, to achieve the speed of light we would need a wheel whose circumference is (300,000,000 / 6666) 45,000 meters, which would equate to a diameter of (45,000 / pi) 14,324 meters - roughly 9 miles.

So we create a structurally-sound, 9-mile-wide wheel and rotate it on an axle, slowly but surely until we achieve 6666rpm.

To run the motor would require an almost unimaginable amount of energy (I reckon), and to find enough material to create a wheel that is structurally sound enough to not fall apart in the process would most likely be inconceivable, but ...

If we could capture enough energy, and obtain the necessary materials, could this work? If not, why not? Something tells me that the laws of physics somehow prevent the physical integrity necessary for such a wheel, but this is simply a guess.


Andrew
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well...if you understand that C is a physical limit (and you understand why?), why would it matter if you attempted to reach it with linear or rotational acceleration?
 
Because you will need an infinite energy... and there's no "enough" energy that is infinite!

The point is that as the speed of your wheel (or anything else) approaches C, to bring this speed to C you will need E->infinite. So, if you are a genius with a lot of money buy your wheel or create it, but don't say I Had not told you!


C.
 
Greetings Andrew,

Even if it were possible to provide enough energy to force a large wheel to achieve a tangential velocity of light-speed, c, (299,792,458 m/s) and assuming light-speed were actually physically achievable; the G-force experienced by the wheel would be colossal and cause it to fly apart long before you could achieve a velocity that approached a miniscule fraction of c.

The acceleration (a) experienced at a given tangential velocity (v) by whatever mass per the radius (r) of the wheel can be derived by the following kinematics equation:

a = (v)^2 / r

Let’s assume it’s a huge wheel with a radius (r) of 100 meters and we would like to spin it at a velocity (v) of c:

(299,792,458 m/s)^2 / 100 meters = 8.987551787e+14 m/s^2

As you can see, the acceleration (a) is nothing short of colossal and nothing could withstand the G-force per any building materials known by man.

I hope you found this helpful.
 
Whether you're accelerating something tangentially or linearly, as it's velocity (linear or tangential) approaches light speed, it's mass will still begin to approach infinity. And even if it didn't, like Gnosis said, we don't have any materials that wouldn't simply be ripped apart by the magnitude of force necessary to spin something that fast.
 
I posed this question many years ago on a filesharing forum I used to frequent (for a long time I refused to believe that nothing could travel faster than light) convinced I had artfully smashed the cosmic speed limit via a crude thought experiment involving a huge pole stuck to a spinning wheel or something. A wise (if a little sarcastic) fellow forum goer simply linked me something along the lines of this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmRV8wNJdKY&feature=related

not massively helpful I know, but I enjoyed the visual aid.
 
Lol that video was awesome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
639
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K