What is the maximum height reached by an acrobat and monkey pair after grabbing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoffrey159
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height reached by a circus acrobat and a monkey after they grab each other mid-air. The acrobat jumps with an initial velocity and takes the monkey from a height, leading to a combined motion that can be analyzed using the center of mass concept. The equations derived show that the maximum height can be expressed in terms of the masses and initial velocity, with considerations for the time of grabbing and the conservation of momentum. The participants clarify that while energy is not conserved during the inelastic collision of the grab, momentum is conserved due to the absence of external forces acting on the system. The conversation emphasizes understanding the continuity of the center of mass speed during the interaction.
geoffrey159
Messages
535
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


A circus acrobat of mass ##M## leaps straight up with initial velocity ##v_0## from a trampoline. As he rises up, he takes a trained monkey of mass ##m## off a perch at height ##h##, above the trampoline. What is the maximum height attained by the pair?

Homework Equations


center of mass

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I put that ##y_1(t)## is the trajectory of the acrobat, ##y_2(t)## the trajectory of the monkey, and ##t_e## grabbing time. I look at the system acrobat-monkey before and after grabbing.

Before grabbing: Between ##0\le t\le t_e## :
1. ##y_1(t) = tv_0 - \frac{gt^2}{2}##
2. ##y_2(t) = h##
so the vertical component of the center of mass is
## R_y^{(b)}(t) = \frac{1}{m+M} (my_2+My_1) = \frac{1}{m+M} (mh+Mt(v_0 - \frac{gt}{2}) )##After grabbing: When ##t_e \le t##, the center of mass is under external force ##-(m+M)g\vec j##, and its motion is given by:
## R_y^{(a)}(t) = h + (t-t_e) v_1 - \frac{g}{2} (t-t_e)^2 ##

At maximum height, we will have ## \dot R_y^{(a)}(t_{\max}) = 0 ## so that ##t_{\max}- t_e = \frac{v_1}{g}##.
The maximum height will be ## R_y^{(a)}(t_{\max}) = h + \frac{v_1^2}{2g}##

Now we must find ##v_1##.
I assume continuity of the center of mass speed at time ##t_e## ( I'm not sure about that! ), and get that ## v_1 = \frac{M}{m+M}(v_0 - g t_e) ## where the parenthesized term is the speed of the acrobat at grabbing time.

To conclude I must get rid of ##t_e## which is not a constant of the problem. How should I do that please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When grabbing, y1(te) = h too.

However, there might be a much simpler way to deal with this exercise...
 
Hi,
So you solve the equation ## \frac{g}{2} t_e^2 -v_0 t_e + h = 0 ## ? You probably keep the first root since the pair will fall back to height ##h##, therefore ## t_e = \frac{v_0 - \sqrt{v_0^2 - 2 hg}}{g}##

and maximum height is

##(1 - {(\frac{M}{m+M})}^2) h + {(\frac{M}{m+M})}^2 \frac{v_0^2}{2g} ##

Correct?
 
Last edited:
I get that too.

And my idea of a simpler way doesn't apply: the grabbing process is an inelastic collision, so there is no conservation for kinetic + potential energy.
There is momentum conservation (your continuity of c.o.m. speed) that in fact demonstrates this non-conservation.
Nice exercise!
 
Thanks BvU !
I am a starter in mechanics so I have no knowledge of what is energy for now.
I am interested by your explanation about continuity of c.o.m speed which I assumed but not quite well understood.
You justified it by momentum conservation which I understand it prooves continuity. But why is momentum conserved around time ##t_e## ?
 
Yes. There is no external force doing work on the system man+monkey during the grabbing. With ## F = {dp\over dt} ## that means p is the same before and after (it's not constant, but there's no sudden change. But you have me in doubt now ... )
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K