Accidental explosion (Kleppner 3.4)

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoffrey159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a projectile that explodes at the top of its trajectory, leading to two pieces that separate horizontally. The larger piece has three times the mass of the smaller piece, and the smaller piece returns to the launch point. The objective is to determine how far the larger piece lands, with considerations for the center of mass and motion equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the center of mass and the implications of external forces during the explosion. There are attempts to clarify the role of gravitational force and its consistency before and after the explosion.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the problem's dynamics, particularly regarding external forces. Some participants express confidence in the calculations, while others seek clarification on the assumptions made about forces acting on the pieces.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the symmetry of the motion and the implications of gravitational force, with some participants questioning the initial assumptions about external forces during the explosion.

geoffrey159
Messages
535
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


An instrument-carrying projectile accidentally explodes at the top of its trajectory. The horizontal distance between the launch point and the point of explosion is ##L##. The projectile breaks into two pieces which fly apart horizontally. The larger piece has three times the mass of the smaller piece. To the surprise of the scientist in charge, the smaller piece returns to Earth at the launching station. How far away does the larger piece land? Neglect air resistance and effects due to the Earth curvature.

Homework Equations



Center of mass

The Attempt at a Solution



The center of mass of the two pieces is ##\vec R = \frac{1}{4m} (m \vec r_1 + 3m \vec r_2)##,
where ##\vec r_1## is the position of the small piece and ##\vec r_2## the position of the large piece.

The question is to find ##r_{2,x}(t_f)##, where ##t_f## is the time both pieces are back to the ground.

At explosion time ##t_e##, the external forces are ##\vec f_{ext} = ( 0, -4mg)## as the pieces fly apart horizontally.
The equation of motion for the center of mass is :
## R_x(t) = tV_{0,x} ##
## R_y(t) = t(V_{0,y}-\frac{gt}{2})##
Now we are given that:
1. ## V_{0,x} = \frac{L}{t_e} ##
2. ## R_y(t_f) = 0 \Rightarrow t_f = \frac{2V_{0,y}}{g} ##
3. ## \dot R_y(t_e) = 0 \Rightarrow V_{0,y} = g t_e ## because ##R_y(t_e)## is a maximum of the curve ## t \rightarrow R_y(t) ##
4. ## r_{1,x}(t_f) = 0 ## as piece 1 goes back to origin

Using everything above:
## R_x(t_f) = t_f V_{0,x} = 2t_e\frac{L}{t_e} = 2L ##.

Using the definition of ##\vec R##, we get ## r_{2,x}(t_f) = \frac{8}{3}L ##

I found this one hard, is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no fext!
The ##R_x(t_f) = 2L## follows directly from symmetry, then using the definition of R gives r2. Looks fine to me.
That's not all that hard :)
 
Hi, thanks for replying.
Why do you say there are no external forces since the pieces are in motion ?
 
You're right, the gravitational force is present and has the same value before and after the explosion. I misinterpreted (= read too fast).
 
Thanks, because if I was wrong, it would mean that I get a right answer with a wrong proof. And that is worse than anything ;-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K