Acura/Bentley: FINAL EXAM REVIEW

  • Thread starter Thread starter Metamorphose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Final Review
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two cars, an Acura and a Bentley, accelerating towards each other from rest. The time of collision is derived as t = √(2L/(Aa - Ab)), where Aa and Ab are the accelerations of the Acura and Bentley, respectively. The distance traveled by the Bentley before the crash is calculated as Xb = (AbL)/(Aa - Ab) + L. Additionally, the relative speed of the Bentley with respect to the Acura just before the crash is determined using the derived equations, emphasizing the importance of checking assumptions about acceleration signs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and equations of motion
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts such as integration
  • Knowledge of relative motion and acceleration
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
  • Learn about integration techniques in physics
  • Explore relative velocity concepts in collision scenarios
  • Review problem-solving strategies for physics exams
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics exams, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion dynamics in collision problems.

Metamorphose
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
1. Two cars, an Acura and a Bentley, are initially at rest a distance L from each other. At time t = 0 both cars starts accelerating toward each other, with constant acceleration Aa amd Ab respectively, until they crash into each other.

a) At what time does the crash happen?

b) Find the distance traveled by the Bentley before the crash.

c) What is the relative speed of the Bentley, with respect to the Acura, just before the
crash?Write your results in terms of L, Aa, and Ab. Remember to check the dimensions/units for
each answer.

2.
EQUATIONS: (WE CANNOT USE MEMORIZED EQUATIONS, WE MUST DERIVE THEM GIVEN THE INFORMATION.

Va = ∫Aa(dt) --> Aa(t) + Voa

Xa = ∫Va(dt) --> 0.5Aa(t)^2 + Voa(t) + Xoa

Vb = ∫Ab(dt) --> Ab(t) + Vob

Xb = ∫Vb(dt) --> 0.5Ab(t)^2 + Vob(t) + Xob

The Attempt at a Solution



[a] The cars will crash when their positions are the same ---> Xa = Xb.

0.5Aa(t)^2 + Voa(t) + Xoa = 0.5Ab(t)^2 + Vob(t) + Xob

You can take out both Voa and Vob because the problem states that they are initially at rest. Let Xoa be at the origin, making it 0 and Xob = L because that is the distance between it and the Acura.∴ 0.5Aa(t)^2 = 0.5Ab(t)^2 + L

Aa(t)^2 - Ab(t)^2 = 2L ---> t^2 (Aa - Ab) = 2L

t = [(2L/(Aa - Ab))]^0.5. Discard the negative solution for time.[b.] Find the distance traveled by the Bentley before the crash.

Xb = 0.5Ab(t)^2 + Vob(t) + Xob

Once again Vob(t) = 0,

Xb = 0.5Ab([(2L/(Aa - Ab))]^0.5)^2 + L

Xb = 0.5Ab(2L/(Aa-Ab)) + L

Xb = [Ab(L)/(Aa-Ab)] + L

Is this correct?

Any help for this and part C will be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Metamorphose said:
[a] The cars will crash when their positions are the same ---> Xa = Xb.

0.5Aa(t)^2 + Voa(t) + Xoa = 0.5Ab(t)^2 + Vob(t) + Xob

You can take out both Voa and Vob because the problem states that they are initially at rest. Let Xoa be at the origin, making it 0 and Xob = L because that is the distance between it and the Acura.


∴ 0.5Aa(t)^2 = 0.5Ab(t)^2 + L

Aa(t)^2 - Ab(t)^2 = 2L ---> t^2 (Aa - Ab) = 2L

t = [(2L/(Aa - Ab))]^0.5. Discard the negative solution for time.

Check your assumptions about the signs of the various quantities. Suppose the accelerations of the vehicle's happened to be the same, what would be the time of the collision according to your derived formula?
 
Because the Bentley will be accelerating to the left, it's acceleration should be labeled as -Ab.

Which when plugged in should give:

0.5Aa(t)^2 = -0.5Ab(t)^2 + L

Aa(t)^2 + Ab(t)^2 = 2L ---> t^2 (Aa + Ab) = 2L

t = [(2L/(Aa + Ab))]^0.5.
 
Metamorphose said:
Because the Bentley will be accelerating to the left, it's acceleration should be labeled as -Ab.

Which when plugged in should give:

0.5Aa(t)^2 = -0.5Ab(t)^2 + L

Aa(t)^2 + Ab(t)^2 = 2L ---> t^2 (Aa + Ab) = 2L

t = [(2L/(Aa + Ab))]^0.5.
That's better :smile: Always check to see if your results make sense by seeing if any 'pathological' behaviors can arise.

Now you can rework your answer for part .
 
Thank You :) I tend to loose marks due to these silly mistakes. Reworking Part B gives:

XB = -0.5aBt2 + V0Bt + X0B

V0Bt = 0

∴ XB = -0.5aBt2 + L

XB = -0.5aB[(2L)/(aA+ aB]2 + L

XB = -aB/(aA + aB] + L
 
Metamorphose said:
Thank You :) I tend to loose marks due to these silly mistakes. Reworking Part B gives:

XB = -0.5aBt2 + V0Bt + X0B

V0Bt = 0

∴ XB = -0.5aBt2 + L

XB = -0.5aB[(2L)/(aA+ aB]2 + L

XB = -aB/(aA + aB] + L

Okay, that's B's position, but how far did he travel? Distance traveled is his change in position.
 
XB = -0.5aBt2 + V0Bt + X0B

V0Bt = 0

∴ XB = -0.5aBt2 + L

XB = -0.5aB[(2L)/(aA+ aB]2 + L

XB = -aBL/(aA + aB] + L

XB = -aBL/(aA + aB) + L(aA + aB)/(aA + aB)

XB = aA(L)/(aA + aB)?

I was looking over a document I found and in that document, the Bentley was placed at the origin instead of the acura, causing the final answer to be similar to the one above. Does it matter which car is placed at the origin?
 
Metamorphose said:
XB = -0.5aBt2 + V0Bt + X0B

V0Bt = 0

∴ XB = -0.5aBt2 + L

XB = -0.5aB[(2L)/(aA+ aB]2 + L

XB = -aBL/(aA + aB] + L

XB = -aBL/(aA + aB) + L(aA + aB)/(aA + aB)

XB = aA(L)/(aA + aB)?
You've still only calculated the position of the Bentley. The distance covered should be given by the final position minus the initial position. Since the initial position is at distance L...
I was looking over a document I found and in that document, the Bentley was placed at the origin instead of the acura, causing the final answer to be similar to the one above. Does it matter which car is placed at the origin?
No, it shouldn't matter. It will simply change the signs of some of the values.
 

Similar threads

Replies
100
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K