Acute Angle Between Z-Axis and Surface Normal in Surface and Angles Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter thenewbosco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Surface
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between the acute angle \(\gamma\) between the z-axis and the normal to a surface defined by \(F(x,y,z)=0\). Participants are exploring the implications of this relationship and the nature of the surface involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the nature of the surface \(F(x,y,z)=0\) and whether specific forms, such as a plane, can be used in the proof. There is also discussion about the properties of the normal vector to the surface and its relation to the gradient.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights and clarifications about the definitions and properties involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to find the normal vector and the interpretation of partial derivatives.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the requirement that \(F(x,y,z)\) has continuous partial derivatives, and participants are navigating the implications of using specific surface forms versus the general case.

thenewbosco
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Prove that the acute angle [tex]\gamma[/tex] between the z axis and the normal to the surface F(x,y,z)=0 at any point is given by [tex]sec \gamma = \frac{\sqrt{F_x^2 +F_y^2+F_z^2}}{|F_z|}}[/tex]

Where i am having trouble is that i do not know what this surface is, can someone help clarify what the surface is. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is that it doesn't matter what the surface is, the equation should hold for any F(x,y,z) with continuous partial derivatives.
 
can i use something like Ax + By + Cz = D as the surface and then show this relationship?
 
No, Ax + By + Cz = D is the equation of a plane, a very specific type of surface. This question asks you to prove it for any surface of the form F(x,y,z) = 0. You first need to find the equation of a normal vector to the surface, then work on what [tex]\gamma[/tex] might be.
 
or would it be [tex]AF_x + BF_y + CF_z = D[/tex] where the normal vector would be [A, B, C]?
 
i am not sure how to begin this one, is there any hint for what i should go about doing
 
thenewbosco said:
i am not sure how to begin this one, is there any hint for what i should go about doing

slearch said:
You first need to find the equation of a normal vector to the surface.

And to do this, you should think about what the properties the normal vector to a surface might have.
 
oh does the F sub x mean the x part of the gradient?
 
[tex]F_x[/tex] is the partial of F with respect to x, yes.
 
  • #10
thanks, it was no problem actually i just had some brain cramp and didnt think of [tex]F_x[/tex] being the x component of the gradient vector
 
  • #11
glad to help :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K