Adding Electric Fields - Find Simplification Solution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the simplification of the sum of two electric fields represented in complex exponential form. The fields are given as E_1 e^{i(kz- \omega t)} and E_2 e^{i(-kz- \omega t)}, where E_1 and E_2 are real quantities. The goal is to express the resultant field in a simplified form involving a magnitude and an exponential term.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss factoring out common terms and applying Euler's formula. There is a focus on how to express the sum in a simplified manner, with some questioning the complexity of the steps involved. Others inquire about calculating the absolute value and argument of the resulting complex number.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the simplification process and questioning the clarity of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Euler's formula and the conversion from Cartesian to polar coordinates, but there is no explicit consensus on the next steps or final form.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be perceived as trivial, yet there are complexities involved in the simplification and interpretation of the results. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to proceed, indicating potential gaps in understanding the underlying concepts.

PhDorBust
Messages
141
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Have two electric fields.

[tex]\hat{x} E_1 e^{i(kz- \omega t)}[/tex]
[tex]\hat{x} E_2 e^{i(-kz- \omega t)}[/tex]

Where E_1, E_2 are real.

Sum them such that the result can be expressed as one magnitude and exponential, e.g., |E|e^(iq), Where E is real.

I have no clue how I would begin to simplify this. Any ideas? It's from an undergraduate text.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Factor out the common factor of e-iωt. Use Euler's formula, e=cos θ + i sin θ.
 
Sure.. but that's trivial detail and not key step.

[tex]e^{-i \omega t}[(E_1 + E_2) cos(kz) + i(E_1 - E_2) sin(kz)][/tex]
 
Well, the rest is even more trivial, so I have no idea where you're getting stuck.
 
Perhaps wording is unclear. Here is answer. Looks little complex for name of trivial, so long that I attach rather than typeset in latex =].

Disregard the unit vector.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.GIF
    untitled.GIF
    10.5 KB · Views: 543
PhDorBust said:
Sure.. but that's trivial detail and not key step.

[tex]e^{-i \omega t}[(E_1 + E_2) cos(kz) + i(E_1 - E_2) sin(kz)][/tex]

So now, how do you calculate the absolute value of a complex number? And its argument? That's just converting from cartesian to polar coordinates in the complex plane (if we ignore the factor e^(-iωt) which you can set apart).

(The only non-trivial part apart from that conversion will be using the identity sin² φ + cos² φ = 1).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K