Addition of spin angular momenta

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epsilonjon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Angular Spin
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the addition of spin angular momenta in quantum mechanics, specifically as presented in Griffith's Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Participants explore the mathematical representation of spin states, the nature of wavefunctions, and the implications of combining Hilbert spaces for two spin-1/2 particles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the total state of the atom is represented as a product of spin states (\chi_1\chi_2) rather than a sum (\chi_1 + \chi_2).
  • Another participant clarifies that the wavefunction of two particles is indeed the product of the individual wavefunctions.
  • A participant raises a concern about the transition from vector representations of spin states to the product form, suggesting a connection to probability theory.
  • One participant explains that the addition of angular momentum involves taking the tensor product of two Hilbert spaces, which leads to a combined state representation.
  • There is mention of constructing operators on the combined Hilbert space from the original operators, detailing how this relates to the total spin operator.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of bilinear forms in the context of operators on the combined space and hints at the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for separating spin states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the mathematical framework and implications of combining spin states. While some points are clarified, there remains uncertainty about the transition from individual to combined states and the underlying linear algebra concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions about the nature of wavefunctions and the mathematical formalism involved in the tensor product of Hilbert spaces. The discussion does not resolve the confusion surrounding the representation of spin states.

epsilonjon
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am working my way through Griffith's Introduction To Quantum Mechanics and I have got to the section on addition of spin angular momenta. I'll copy and paste the bit I'm struggling with, as it's easier than paraphrasing:

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2783/80183858.png

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/1294/20886932.png

I'm assuming [itex]\chi_1[/itex] is the spin state of the electron and [itex]\chi_2[/itex] is the spin state of the proton. So why is the total state of the atom written as [itex]\chi_1\chi_2[/itex]? Why not [itex]\chi_1 + \chi_2[/itex] or something different?

Secondly, he says that [itex]S^{(1)}[/itex] acts only on [itex]\chi_1[/itex], and [itex]S^{(2)}[/itex] acts only on [itex]\chi_2[/itex]. Why is this, and how come [itex]S \equiv S^{(1)}+S^{(2)}[/itex]? If the two particles are both spin 1/2 then aren't the matrices [itex]S^{(1)}[/itex] and [itex]S^{(2)}[/itex] both the same (i.e. just given by the 2x2 Pauli spin matrices)?

I think if I was clearer on those two points maybe the rest will make sense, so I will leave it there.

Thanks for any help! :smile:
Jon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Chis are wavefunctions. The wavefunction of two particles is the product of the individual wavefunctions.
 
Oh right. It's strange that he's just thrown that in there with no explanation. Is it something to do with the fact that [itex]P(A \cap B)=P(A)P(B)[/itex] when the probabilities are not connected?

Up to that point (for spin 1/2) the chis were represented by two-element vectors and the spin operators were 2x2 matrices, but this seems to have gone completely out the window?

Thanks for your help.
 
This point confused me for a really long time when first learning it as well. The reason it doesn't quite seem to follow logically is that they're taking some shortcuts to avoid a big digression into linear algebra. The shortcuts end up working, but if you don't understand what's going on underneath, it can seem a bit arbitrary.

What actually happens when you do angular momentum addition is that you're taking the tensor product of two Hilbert spaces. What that means is that if the first particle lives in the Hilbert space [itex]\mathcal{H_1}[/itex], and the second particle lives in the Hilbert space [itex]\mathcal{H_2}[/itex], then the combined system lives in the Hilbert space [itex]\mathcal{H_1}\times\mathcal{H_2}[/itex]. An element of this space looks like [itex](h_1, h_2)[/itex], where [itex]h_1\in\mathcal{H_1}, h_2\in\mathcal{H_2}[/itex]. As part of the definition of the tensor product, we also define [itex](ah_1, h_2) = a(h_1, h_2)[/itex], and [itex](h_1, bh_2) = b(h_1, h_2)[/itex].

You can also construct operators on this new combined space, out of the operators from the original spaces. Specifically, if [itex]S_1[/itex] is an operator on [itex]\mathcal{H_1}[/itex], then you can construct an operator on the combined Hilbert space by making [itex](S_1, 1)[/itex], where we define [itex](S_1,1)(h_1, h_2) = (S_1h_1, h_2) = (s_1h_1,h_2) = s_1(h_1, h_2)[/itex]. A similar process can be done for [itex]\mathcal{H_2}[/itex]. Therefore, in this notation, the total spin operator is really [itex]S = (S_1, 1) + (1, S_2)[/itex]. By substituting in these definitions, you should be able to see how this operator leads to eigenvalues which are the sums of the eigenvalues of the individual states.

The operators I constructed here are special cases of the general concept of an operator on the combined space, which is called a bilinear form. The general case is [itex](S_1, S_2)[/itex], which, if [itex]S_1h_1 = s_1h_1[/itex] and [itex]S_2h_2=s_2h_2[/itex], leads to [itex](S_1, S_2)(h_1, h_2) = (s_1h_1, s_2h_2) = s_1s_2(h_1, h_2)[/itex]. Defined this way, the combined operator is linear with respect to variations of either [itex]h_1[/itex] or [itex]h_2[/itex], hence the name. In the sections immediately following the one you're currently reading, you'll learn how to change the basis states of the combined Hilbert space into one where the bilinear form for spin separates the states out into two sub-spaces (the spin singlet and the spin triplet), using a process called a Clebsch-Gordan decomposition.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K