Advanced Calculus: Frenet Formulas & Radius of Curvature

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Frenet formulas and the concept of radius of curvature as presented in the context of Advanced Calculus. Participants explore the mathematical definitions and intuitive understandings of these concepts, particularly in relation to the decomposition of the acceleration vector in motion along a curve.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the Frenet formulas and the meaning of radius of curvature as described in a calculus textbook.
  • Another participant explains that the radius of curvature is the reciprocal of the curvature of a path, suggesting that 1/p represents the curvature.
  • A participant expresses dissatisfaction with their previous education and requests online resources for a better intuitive understanding of radius of curvature.
  • One participant offers an intuitive explanation of radius of curvature by describing the osculating circle that best fits the curve at a given point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the understanding of radius of curvature, as some express confusion while others provide explanations. Multiple views on how to grasp these concepts remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of prior exposure to the concepts, which may affect their understanding. The discussion includes varying levels of familiarity with the mathematical background required to fully grasp the topics.

binarybob0001
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Advanced Calculus by Wilfred Kaplan 1952. He is demonstrating how to find the decomposition of the acceleration vector into its normal and tangential components. I'm following along until he replaces the magnitude of the derivative of the angle with respect to the distance traveled by the particle along the curve with 1/p where p is the radius of curvature of the path. Later in the book, he mentions Frenet formulas. Can anyone explain what these Frenet formulas are about and what he means by radius of curvature of the path? Or did I not supply enough information? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should have covered radius of curvature in calculus. It's the reciprocal of the curvature of a path so that your [itex]\frac{1}{\rho}[/itex] is just the curvature itself.

As for the Frenet formulas, you might try this:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FrenetFormulas.html
 
Well, a community college isn't exactly the best way to learn multivariable calculus. That is why I'm reading this book. Are there any online references that can give me an intuitive understanding of what you are talking about. I still do not know what the radius of curvature is. Thanks.
 
Here's an intuitive idea:
Think of some (smooth) curve lying in a plane.
At any point of the curve, you may ask:
Which circle will be the best fit of the curve's behaviour at that point?
(This is somewhat analogous to saying that the "tangent" at a point is the best line fit to the curve's behaviour there.)

That circle is called the "osculating" (kissing) circle at the point, and its radius is the radius of curvature at that point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K