Advanced probability theory books?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on learning the calculus of general random variables, particularly those without a density or mass function. Three main approaches are highlighted: using densities with delta functions, cumulative distributions with Stieltjes-type integrals, and probability measures. Billingsley's book is recommended for its readability and integration of measure theory with probability, while Shiryaev's is noted for its concise organization. The conversation also mentions Chung's book as a more formal option, suitable for graduate courses. Overall, measure theory is emphasized as essential for understanding advanced topics in probability.
bpet
Messages
531
Reaction score
7
I'm interested in learning the calculus of general random variables, i.e. those that do not necessarily have a density or mass function - such as mixtures of continuous / discrete / Cantor-type variables.

There seem to be several different approaches:

1. Via densities, using delta functions etc, e.g. E[X]=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x f(x)dx

2. Via cumulative distributions, using Stieltjes-type integrals, e.g. E[X]=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xdF(x)

3. Via probability measures, e.g. E[X]=\int x d\mu(x)

Each seems to have a well developed rigorous theory. What would be the best approach to focus on, and what's a good accessible book on the subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you learn (3), then you will develop (1) and (2) as part of the process. F(x) = \mu((-\infty,x]), and the probability density function f(x) exists if F is an absolutely continuous function.

I like Billingsley's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471007102/?tag=pfamazon01-20 because it's a very readable yet rigorous treatment that doesn't assume that you already know measure theory and Lebesgue(-Stieltjes) integration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks - sounds like measure theory is the way to go and will be useful for more advanced topics.

Having a very basic and incomplete knowledge of Lebesgue integration, I'm tossing up between Billingsley and Shiryaev's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387945490/?tag=pfamazon01-20 - the gist of the reviews seems to be that B is more of a gentle essay-style introduction whereas S is more concise and efficiently organized. Any thoughts on this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bpet said:
Thanks - sounds like measure theory is the way to go and will be useful for more advanced topics.

Having a very basic and incomplete knowledge of Lebesgue integration, I'm tossing up between Billingsley and Shiryaev's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387945490/?tag=pfamazon01-20 - the gist of the reviews seems to be that B is more of a gentle essay-style introduction whereas S is more concise and efficiently organized. Any thoughts on this?

I haven't read Shiryaev's book, so I can't compare the two. Billingsley isn't organized as a reference; he deliberately interleaves the probability material with measure theory on an "as-needed" basis, which is nice because everything seems properly motivated as you read through it. I would not say that his book is gentle per se (parts of it are quite tough), but it flows pretty well and he does a good job letting you know what he's doing and why.

Besides Billingsley and Shiryaev, another commonly used probability book at this level is Chung's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0121741516/?tag=pfamazon01-20. I've only skimmed it, and it looks fine, but a lot more dry than Billingsley. For example, Billingsley has a cool chapter about gambling theory, and often sprinkles interesting side topics such as "Strange Euclidean Sets" and the Banach-Tarski paradox, but Chung takes more of a no-nonsense approach. Chung is probably more appropriate for a graduate course, whereas Billingsley seems better for self-study. Just my opinion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K