Advice request - design a toy steam engine and do a pull event

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on modifying a 'Mamod toy steam engine' for a pull event, where the engine must pull the maximum load over a 60-inch flat course within a 5-minute time limit. Key considerations include the use of small versus large wheels or tracks, the choice between a commercial gearbox and Meccano gears, and the potential benefits of a heavier solid flywheel. Additionally, the use of miniature bearings and lubrication is recommended for the drivetrain, while mechanical variable gearing is deemed unnecessary, with a torque converter suggested as an alternative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mamod toy steam engine mechanics
  • Knowledge of gear ratios and their impact on performance
  • Familiarity with drivetrain components, including bearings and lubrication
  • Basic principles of mechanical advantage in pulling systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency of commercial gearboxes versus Meccano gears
  • Explore the impact of flywheel weight on engine performance
  • Investigate the use of miniature bearings in model engineering
  • Learn about torque converters and their application in model pulling events
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for hobbyists, model engineers, and competitors in toy steam engine events looking to enhance performance and design strategies for pulling competitions.

Novice One
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Advice request -- design a toy steam engine and do a pull event

Hello,

Please do forgive me if this is inappropriate use of this sight, I'm looking for general advice, any suggestions as to where I could get information and thoughts on the subject are welcome.

I've taken a challenge to build and enter a competition to modify a 'Mamod toy steam engine' and enter a pull event. The engine on one fuel fill will have to pull as much load as possible over a 5' or 60 Inch flat course, with a 5 min time limit. The cylinder assembly, burner and safety vale have to remain standard. I understand that around 2000 RPM is available.

The design apart from the above proviso's can be as outlandish / revolutionary as required. My perception of this is that this is a task around gearing. However I'm thinking in relation to other points and need answers advice and suggestions.

1 - Would this task be better performed with small wheels, larger wheels or tracks
2 - Should I use a small commercial gear box or use Meccano gears
3 - Updating the Flywheel to solid, much heavier, will that give me an advantage / benefit
4 - Should I consider using miniature bearings and lubrication on the drive train
5 - Would there be an advantage to having variable gearing / how could this be achieved?


At this time a competitor has a pull weight of around 30 Kg - on a trolley pulled by the engine, which I consider very interesting.

Again sorry if this is inappropriate

Thanks & Regards

Mark
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

1. What is the surface it needs to grip?
2. Commercial box will be more efficient.
3. Flywheel is needed if single cylinder.
4. Commercial gearbox needs bearings but final axles can be simple shafts in bushes.
5. No advantage in mechanical variable gearing. Maybe torque converter?

If the rules allow, you might consider a capstan or winch to pull the engine along the course.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K