Ageing of the universe using percentages of Uranium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coffeem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe Uranium
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on estimating the age of the solar system using the percentages of uranium isotopes found on Earth, specifically uranium-238 and uranium-235. The user attempted to calculate the age by using the formula (1/2)^n = 0.7/50, leading to an estimate of approximately 8.5 billion years. However, this calculation is incorrect, as it does not account for the differing half-lives of the isotopes, which are 6.5 billion years for uranium-238 and 1 billion years for uranium-235. Accurate age estimation requires a more nuanced approach that considers the initial abundance of both isotopes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-lives
  • Familiarity with uranium isotopes, specifically uranium-238 and uranium-235
  • Basic algebra for solving exponential equations
  • Knowledge of the solar system's formation timeline
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the method of radiometric dating using uranium isotopes
  • Learn about the calculation of age using the decay equations for uranium-238 and uranium-235
  • Explore the concept of initial conditions in radioactive decay
  • Study the implications of isotopic ratios in geological time scales
USEFUL FOR

Students in geology, physics, or astronomy, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the methods used to estimate the age of the solar system through radiometric dating techniques.

coffeem
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At the present time natual uranium found on Earth consists of 99.3% uranium 238 and 0.7% uranium 235. The measured half lives of these isotopes is 6.5ee9 years and 1.0ee9 years respectvely. By assuming they were equally abundent at time of formation, estimate the age of the solar system.


The Attempt at a Solution



(1/2)^n=0.7/50

this implies 8.537 half lives.

this indicates 8.5ee9 years. This isn't the correct answer, could someone please direct me to where I am going wrong and suggest what I might like to do instead. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone please help me with this? I have posted as much as I have been able to do... I would even appretiate your ideas if you are not 100% sure. Thanks
 
Surely someone can help me with this? Have I posted it in the wrong place?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K