randa177
- 90
- 1
why is getting the age from CMD more accurate than getting it from photometry?
The discussion revolves around the accuracy of determining the ages of star clusters using color magnitude diagrams (CMD) compared to photometry. Participants explore the reasons why CMDs might provide more reliable age estimates and seek clarification on the methodologies involved.
Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the advantages of CMDs over photometry, and there is no consensus on the specific methodologies for age determination from CMDs. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple viewpoints presented.
Participants mention the importance of definitions and clarify that CMD is not a universally recognized abbreviation, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.
Individuals interested in astrophysics, particularly in stellar evolution, star cluster analysis, and the methodologies used in astronomical observations.
mgb_phys said:CMD isn't a very common abbreviation, most people would say HR diagram.
Do you mean - how to get the age of stars from a color magnitude (ie Hertzsprung–Russell) diagram?
mgb_phys said:Not sure I understand the question. You use photometry to get the color index of the star. Then plotted on the HR diagram gives you the age (or at least the evolutionary state of the star) for an accurate age you would also need to know metalicity and mass.