Can Mirrored Solar Arrays Create a Continuous Ion Channel for Energy Transfer?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the feasibility of using mirrored solar arrays to create a continuous ion channel for energy transfer from the upper atmosphere to the ground. Participants debate the potential of targeting specific elevations, akin to a stepped leader in thunderstorms, to generate ions and facilitate energy flow. While some express skepticism about the practicality and efficiency of this method compared to established technologies like solar thermal energy generation, others advocate for further research into innovative energy solutions. The consensus leans towards existing methods being more effective for energy production.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ionization processes in atmospheric physics
  • Familiarity with solar thermal energy systems, particularly the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility
  • Knowledge of electrical conduction and potential difference principles
  • Basic concepts of energy transfer mechanisms in the atmosphere
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of ionization and its applications in energy transfer
  • Explore solar thermal energy technologies and their efficiency compared to proposed methods
  • Investigate the role of thunderstorms and lightning in atmospheric electricity
  • Study the environmental impacts of various energy generation methods, including solar arrays
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, energy engineers, and environmental scientists interested in innovative energy solutions and atmospheric physics will benefit from this discussion.

Chris Nimmons
If one was to create an array of X amount of mirrors tracking the sun and shining on a targeted spot in the sky to create ions at specific elevations similar to a ladder, could this cause an ion column to create a continuous charge of energy from the upper atmosphere to hit the ground?

Lets say we have tier one targeting a spot at .5 km above the earth, also a tier two targeting 1 km above the Earth and a tier three at 2 km and so on and so on into the ionosphere at 75 km. The ions would rise between the tier steps creating a conduction channel. The distances above the Earth are changeable.

This ionized channel from my understanding is the same thing as a stepped leader from a thunder storm, creating a source of power from the potential difference between the upper atmosphere and the Earth the ground? Is this something that can be done? Also what implications would this have on radio wave transmission and the atmosphere?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Chris Nimmons said:
If one was to create an array of X amount of mirrors tracking the sun and shining on a targeted spot in the sky to create ions at specific elevations similar to a ladder, could this cause an ion column to create a continuous charge of energy from the upper atmosphere to hit the ground?

how/why would it hit the ground ??

and I strongly doubt that your thread should be labelled advanced ... post graduate level ... really ??
 
Chris Nimmons said:
Is this something that can be done?
Why? To create lightnings? What for?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Thanks for your response! I wasn't sure where to put my post because I am new to the forum and don't quite get the levels of academia. We all have to learn some way so I now know not to post here again with my ideas. :) I should have done more research.

Focusing the suns light on one object can produce an enormous amount of heat. Each added mirror increases the heat during the day. This total heat can charge the particles at its focus. If enough energy is produced could the particles become ionized at the target? If the target had enough heat could the heat move upward towards the next focal target pushing the ionized particles upward creating a channel of ions. If it reached a high enough altitude would this create a medium to transfer a flow of electrons back to the earth? I may have a total misunderstanding of lightning but there's not much out there to read. We don't understand it all that well from my gathering since its one of those perfect situation kind of things.

I am not sure why your mad but I hope you have a great day!
 
fresh_42 said:
Why? To create lightnings? What for?

For energy. We don't have the batteries today but why not research it for the future? You have to have a problem to solve before you can solve it right? You can't know what you don't know.
 
You can probably ionize the air, but along the entire beam and there is no target, as such a beam doesn't end. So you have more of a horizontal and potentially hazardous effect than a vertical effect. If you install such a beam, it would be far easier and way more efficient (and is actually done), to heat either salt, oil (storage) or air (vertical turbine) to generate energy. I cannot see any possibility to harvest energy from such a set-up. The ions would be permanently exchanged by the turbulence the heat of the beam causes. I don't even think that the production of a single lightning is possible. For research purposes they use thunder clouds and copper wires. This must be for a reason.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
The image button is not working however here is a side profile of what i am talking about. The straight lines at the bottom are mirrors, the arrows going up are the photons and the circles are the target positions.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B55-mGt4dNtbTlMyR1JqeW9QWGM/view?usp=sharing
 
Chris Nimmons said:
For energy. We don't have the batteries today but why not research it for the future? You have to have a problem to solve before you can solve it right? You can't know what you don't know.

it's already done much easier by heating a boiler for steam to turn turbines and it doesn't harm the atmosphere or anything flying through it
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chris Nimmons
davenn said:
it's already done much easier by heating a boiler for steam to turn turbines and it doesn't harm the atmosphere or anything flying through it

Whats it called? Can i get a link?
 
  • #11
Thanks for the link. I've seen it in person. Its not the same idea and i figured that's what you would link. I appreciate your time and wish you the best! :)
 
  • #12
Chris Nimmons said:
Thanks for the link. I've seen it in person. Its not the same idea and i figured that's what you would link.

it's much more direct and therefore efficient that what you were proposing
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K