Air Resistance & Wind Resistance Equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equations representing air resistance and wind resistance, exploring their dependencies on velocity, air density, and other factors. Participants examine the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of these equations in various contexts, including aviation and other moving objects.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that air resistance can be represented as \(\vec F_{air} = c \vec v\), while others suggest that it should be proportional to the square of the velocity, \(\vec{F} \propto \vec{v}^2\).
  • One participant emphasizes that the ground is irrelevant to the interaction with air for aircraft, suggesting that everything should be considered relative to the vehicle.
  • Another participant reiterates that wind is simply moving air and that the same resistance formula applies, requiring a shift to a frame where the air is stationary.
  • There is a mention of the importance of air density in calculating drag, with a formula provided: \(\vec{F} \propto \rho \vec{v}^2\), and a more detailed equation for wind resistance that includes the drag coefficient and cross-sectional area.
  • Some participants note that the drag coefficient \(C_d\) can vary based on factors such as the Rayleigh number, Mach number, and angle of incidence, indicating its nonlinearity in certain contexts.
  • One participant acknowledges a common oversight regarding the inclusion of cross-sectional area in calculations, particularly in aerospace engineering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equations for air and wind resistance, with no consensus reached on the exact formulations or the significance of various factors such as air density and drag coefficients.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the conditions under which the equations apply, such as the relevance of the ground in different scenarios and the nonlinearity of the drag coefficient in various contexts.

bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
What equation represents the force of air resistance? Is it simply \vec F_{air} = c \vec v, or must the velocity be raised to a higher power?

*Also, which equation represents wind resistance to an object, in the case where a wind is blowing relative to the ground ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry that I can't do anything about the formula. I can tell you, however, that at least for the purposes of an aircraft the ground is totally irrelevant to your reaction with the air. Ignore it, because there should be no difference between 'static' and 'dynamic' air; everything is relative to the vehicle or whatever that you're dealing with. There is a 'ground effect' involving boundary layers and such, but I get the impression that it doesn't apply to what you're asking about.
 
Air resistance goes as the velocity squared. Wind is just moving air, so you can use the same formula, but you have shift into a frame in which the air is stationary. That is,

\vec{F} \propto \vec{v}^2

\vec{v} = \vec{v}_{object}-\vec{v}_{wind}
 
SpaceTiger said:
Air resistance goes as the velocity squared. Wind is just moving air, so you can use the same formula, but you have shift into a frame in which the air is stationary. That is,

\vec{F} \propto \vec{v}^2

\vec{v} = \vec{v}_{object}-\vec{v}_{wind}

Ahh..velocity squared! Thanks SpaceTiger :smile:
 
I think you are missing a crucial piece of information here. Drag is proportional to the velocity squared times the air density.

\vec{F} \propto \rho \vec{v}^2

The formula for "wind" resistance usually written in the following form:

\vec{F} = C_d \frac{1}{2} \rho \vec{v}^2 {S}

Where "Cd" is the coefficient of drag. For engineering purposes the drag coefficient is usually split between a pressure and a skin friction coefficient.

-----
Can someone explain to me why my second image says "vecF" and not just F ?

edit:Fixed a dumb mistake
 
Last edited:
Jouke said:
I think you are missing a crucial piece of information here. Drag is proportional to the velocity squared times the air density.

\vec{F} \propto \rho \vec{v}^2

The formula for "wind" resistance usually written in the following form:

\vec{F} = C_d \frac{1}{2} \rho \vec{v}^2

Where "Cd" is the coefficient of drag. For engineering purposes the drag coefficient is usually split between a pressure and a skin friction coefficient.

-----
Can someone explain to me why my second image says "vecF" and not just F ?

If you want to include air density, you should also include the area of the cross section of the flying body.
\vec{F} = C_d \frac{1}{2} \rho S\vec{v}^2
Also, C_d is a hyghly nonlinear coefficient, which depends on the Rayleigh number, the Mach number and on the angle of incidence. For constant Rayleigh and Mach numbers and small incidence angles, C_d can be linearized as C_d= C_{d0} + C_{di}i, where i is the angle of incidence: the angle the relative wind velocity makes with the symmetry axis of the body.
 
Oops my mistake I've always had a nasty tendency to forget about the (wing) area a major mistake, especially if you're studying aerospace engineering.

It is true that Cd is highly nonlinear coefficient. But for things like bullets, cars, trains, cyclists and people the Value for Cd is pretty much a constant. Things start geting complicated when you're looking at aeroplanes, rockets and other thingy's which go faster then 100m/s.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K