Aldol Condensation: Why is OH a Good LG?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brake4country
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condensation
AI Thread Summary
In aldol condensation, hydroxide (OH) is considered a good leaving group due to the presence of excess hydroxide in the reaction mixture, which stabilizes the leaving process. The mechanism involves the formation of a carbanion that facilitates the departure of the hydroxyl group, despite its general classification as a poor leaving group. The discussion emphasizes that leaving group ability exists on a spectrum rather than a binary classification, allowing for varying degrees of effectiveness. The importance of correctly drawing the mechanism is highlighted, as it clarifies the roles of the reactants and the leaving group. Understanding the context of the reaction conditions is crucial for grasping why hydroxide can function as a leaving group in this scenario.
brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


In a typical aldol condensation (say 2 aldehydes reacted with NaOH, water, and under heated conditions) why is hydroxide considered a good leaving group in the final step?

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew out a mechanism with an aldehyde and a ketone, creating the aldol product. From here, heat is added and hydroxide is protonated in solution to leave behind a carbanion on the alpha carbon. Once the double bond is created by the electrons OH is push off. How is OH a good leaving group in this case?

upload_2014-12-18_21-2-51.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mechanism you drew is not correct in that the lone pair on the carbanion will not "kick off" the hydroxyl group as there is a methylene group between the two. Re-draw the mechanism from scratch to get a better idea of this reaction.

As far as the hydroxyl leaving group, think about what is in your flask. You even drew the reagent over your arrow in the first step. Leaving group ability is not a binary characteristic but instead is a spectrum from "bad" to "good."
 
I see what I did wrong. I connected the carbons incorrectly. Does this look better? However, how can OH leave? Isn't it a bad leaving group?
upload_2014-12-19_20-15-46.png
 
That looks better.

As far as your question goes, refer to the second part of my first post. Good and bad may be used as though they describe a binary phenomenon, but in reality things are not simply yes/no or good/bad. They all fall on a spectrum, so perhaps better terms would be better/worse instead of good bad.

Again think about what is in the flask, you have plenty of hydroxide floating around. It can't be impossible to have hydroxide as a leaving group.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top