Algebra or Calculus based physics to start with?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice between algebra-based and calculus-based physics courses for someone preparing to study Theoretical Physics at university. Participants explore the implications of each approach in terms of depth, rigor, and foundational understanding of physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that starting with algebra-based physics would be a waste of time given the individual's mathematical background and goals, advocating for calculus-based courses instead.
  • Another participant expresses the opinion that calculus-based physics courses are more thorough and suitable for motivated students, implying that algebra-based courses may lack depth.
  • A different viewpoint indicates that in many US schools, first-year physics does not heavily rely on calculus techniques, focusing instead on conceptual understanding and algebraic manipulation.
  • Some participants note that while calculus is introduced, much of the problem-solving in introductory courses still relies on algebra and trigonometry, with calculus becoming more prominent in upper-level classes.
  • There is a mention of variability in how different departments approach the integration of calculus in their physics courses, suggesting that experiences may differ based on institutional practices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the appropriateness of algebra-based versus calculus-based physics courses, with no consensus reached. Some advocate for calculus-based courses due to perceived rigor, while others highlight the foundational role of algebra in introductory physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the use of calculus in physics courses may vary by institution and that the depth of calculus application may not be significant until later courses. There is also an indication that the educational context may differ between the US and UK systems.

Zagreus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

So I'm interested in going to university to study Theoretical Physics but it's been a couple years since high school and I've forgotten pretty much everything about what I learned in physics class. I've always been interested in mathematics though so I went and learned calculus a while back and have gotten pretty competent but recently got into physics. This leads me to my problem. Would it be better to start with calculus based physics or algebra based physics if I know nothing about the subject?

I've read a lot of other posts saying that calculus based physics is more in depth and rigorous than algebra based physics and I'll eventually have to apply calculus to the subject anyway but I was wondering if it would be better to ease myself into physics with algebra to understand the basic concepts and THEN go to calculus for more detail, or if it's better to just start with the calculus based course. Is the prerequisite for a calculus based course having a grasp of physics with the algebra based course? What should I do?

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Given your background and goals, taking an algebra-based physics class would be a big waste of time, IMO. Please just take the regular physics classes. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gleem, Math100, gmax137 and 2 others
Purely opinion, but the more thorough of courses (Physics) would be those which are Calculus-based. Lesser intensity and lesser deep detail might be for less motivated students. In case you are presently weak at semester-one Calculus, study that thoroughly as soon as possible..... !
 
In the US, at most schools (except probably places like MIT, Caltech, et al.), first-year undergraduate physics doesn't actually use much calculus, in terms of the calculation techniques that one learns in a calculus course. It uses calculus mainly as a way to simplify the conceptual side of physics, and the equations. What you really need is a good conceptual understanding of derivatives and integrals, and the most basic techniques for calculating them.

Most of the math in the exercises is still plain old algebra and trigonometry. You need to be fluent at that. In particular, you need to be able to combine equations symbolically in order to arrive at a final equation that lets you calculate the numeric solution in one go, instead of solving each equation numerically and using the result in the next one. Our mantra was "first do all the algebra, then plug in the numbers and do the arithmetic."

Above the first-year level, we move away from exercises that ask for numeric answers, to ones that have equations as answers, using parameters that are stated symbolically (e.g. "a charge of q", instead of "a charge of 1.5 C").

Things may be different in the UK, where your profile indicates you're located.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd, Math100, symbolipoint and 1 other person
Zagreus said:
Hi all,

So I'm interested in going to university to study Theoretical Physics but it's been a couple years since high school and I've forgotten pretty much everything about what I learned in physics class. I've always been interested in mathematics though so I went and learned calculus a while back and have gotten pretty competent but recently got into physics. This leads me to my problem. Would it be better to start with calculus based physics or algebra based physics if I know nothing about the subject?

I've read a lot of other posts saying that calculus based physics is more in depth and rigorous than algebra based physics and I'll eventually have to apply calculus to the subject anyway but I was wondering if it would be better to ease myself into physics with algebra to understand the basic concepts and THEN go to calculus for more detail, or if it's better to just start with the calculus based course. Is the prerequisite for a calculus based course having a grasp of physics with the algebra based course? What should I do?

Thanks a lot
calculus based intro physics is really just algebra based with some derivatives and simple integrals in my experience, the calculus doesn't really get engrained into the physics until the upper div classes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Elj said:
calculus based intro physics is really just algebra based with some derivatives and simple integrals in my experience, the calculus doesn't really get engrained into the physics until the upper div classes
Some departments vary in when and how hard they push the use of Calculus as the courses advance. By recollection Physics-1 fundamental kinematics & mechanics relied mostly on intermediate algebra and basic trigonometry. Physics-2 Electricity&Magnetism, much tougher trigonometry needed and some Calculus and a few things involving what may have been 'simple' linear equation systems. Physics-2 "Modern Physics" which dealt with radiation, optics, nuclear model of the atom, relied mostly on much trigonometry and all of intermediate algebra. Beyond this series of typical courses required of all STEM students, I cannot say.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K