Algebraically Determining the Solution to this Combination

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euler2718
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the combinatorial equation \(\dbinom{7}{r} = 21\), where participants explore algebraic methods to determine the value of \(r\) without resorting to guess and check. The subject area is combinatorics, specifically focusing on binomial coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rewriting the factorial expressions and simplifying them to find solutions. There are attempts to clarify the cancellation of terms in the factorials and how they relate to the equation. Some participants express confusion about the denominator and seek further explanation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications about the factorial definitions and simplifications. There is a recognition of potential solutions, but no consensus has been reached on the complete algebraic method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are encouraged to avoid guess and check methods, focusing instead on algebraic manipulation of the factorials. There is an emphasis on understanding the cancellation of terms and the relationships between the factors involved.

Euler2718
Messages
90
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



\dbinom{7}{r} = 21

Homework Equations



\dbinom{n}{r} = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}

The Attempt at a Solution



\dbinom{7}{r} = 21

\frac{7!}{(7-r)!r!} = 21

7! = 21(7-r)!r!

240 = (7-r)!r!

So I get here and the convention is to guess in check (to my knowledge). I found a way to do it on my TI-84; simply go y= 7 nCr x ; then observe the table to gather the solutions of 5 and 2. But how would you do this algebraically (no guess and check)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Morgan Chafe said:

Homework Statement



\dbinom{7}{r} = 21

Homework Equations



\dbinom{n}{r} = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}

The Attempt at a Solution



\dbinom{7}{r} = 21

\frac{7!}{(7-r)!r!} = 21

7! = 21(7-r)!r!

240 = (7-r)!r!

So I get here and the convention is to guess in check (to my knowledge). I found a way to do it on my TI-84; simply go y= 7 nCr x ; then observe the table to gather the solutions of 5 and 2. But how would you do this algebraically (no guess and check)?
Write out both the factorials and 21 in product form.
##7! =2\cdot3\cdot4\cdot5\cdot6\cdot7##.
##21=3\cdot7##.
See what factors should cancel.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euler2718
ehild said:
2,3,4,5, should cancel with r!

What do you mean?
 
Think of the definition of n!.
\dbinom{7}{r} = \frac{2\cdot3\cdot4\cdot5\cdot6\cdot7}{(2\cdot3\cdot \cdot\cdot)(\cdot\cdot\cdot)}=3\cdot7

Simplifying the fraction, you get 7*3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euler2718
ehild said:
Think of the definition of n!.
\dbinom{7}{r} = \frac{2\cdot3\cdot4\cdot5\cdot6\cdot7}{(2\cdot3\cdot \cdot\cdot)(\cdot\cdot\cdot)}=3\cdot7

Simplifying the fraction, you get 7*3.

Sorry, I still don't quite follow what's happening in the denominator.
 
ehild said:
Think of the definition of n!.
\dbinom{7}{r} = \frac{2\cdot3\cdot4\cdot5\cdot6\cdot7}{(2\cdot3\cdot \cdot\cdot)(\cdot\cdot\cdot)}=3\cdot7

Morgan Chafe said:
Simplifying the fraction, you get 7*3.

Sorry, I still don't quite follow what's happening in the denominator.
ehild is asking you to fill in the missing parts, using the definition of ##\dbinom{7}{r}##. What should be the last (largest) number in (##2 \cdot 3 \cdot \dots ?##)? What should be the factors in (##\dots##)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euler2718
Mark44 said:
ehild is asking you to fill in the missing parts, using the definition of ##\dbinom{7}{r}##. What should be the last (largest) number in (##2 \cdot 3 \cdot \dots ?##)? What should be the factors in (##\dots##)?

I think I have some clarity on it. In the numerator, the only pairs of numbers that even have a chance to be divided (once multiplied together) to make 21 are 7 and 6. So that means that 5! must cancel up in the numerator to leave these two factors. By consequence, (7-5)! = 2! = 2, thus 42/2 = 21. It's also then obvious that if r=2, 5! occurs in the (7-r)!, and also works. Does this reasoning make sense?
 
Yes.
Morgan Chafe said:
I think I have some clarity on it. In the numerator, the only pairs of numbers that even have a chance to be divided (once multiplied together) to make 21 are 7 and 6. So that means that 5! must cancel up in the numerator to leave these two factors. By consequence, (7-5)! = 2! = 2, thus 42/2 = 21. It's also then obvious that if r=2, 5! occurs in the (7-r)!, and also works. Does this reasoning make sense?
Yes. But why do you multiply the factors? 21 = 3*7 and you have to divide 6*7 by 2 to get it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euler2718

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K