I don`t have comment, because i did not have time to look over it.I agree, but I was trying to give conclusion type statment to arguments. It would take too
much time to argue every little concept (philosophy does a good job in not closing issues and openning new ones). My interest is finding how reality works in the physics sense, but I use just enough pertinent philosophy(tammed in Einstien's word) to excute my goal. I learned that when I did my Master's Degree in UK; the stress is on research.
I wonder if you have any thought on the articles in fqxi site.
Here is a site that sort of like arxiv for philosophy of science:http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/