Alpha particle approaching a gold nucleus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An alpha particle approaching a gold nucleus with a charge of 79e experiences an electric force calculated using Coulomb's Law, represented by the equation FE=k(q1q2)/d². The correct calculation yields a force of 9.1e7 N, but the textbook states 9.1e-12 N, indicating a potential error in charge units. The charge of an electron, e, is 1.602e-19 Coulombs, and since it appears twice in the calculation, the correct expression must account for this factor. The discussion concludes that the distance provided in the problem may be a misprint, as it is significantly smaller than the typical size of a nucleus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law
  • Understanding of electric charge in Coulombs
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Familiarity with atomic structure and nucleus size
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about the significance of atomic units and conversions
  • Explore the concept of nuclear sizes and their implications in physics
  • Investigate common errors in physics problem statements and how to identify them
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in understanding the forces acting at the atomic level.

Randell Julius
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An alpha particle approaches at high speeds a gold nucleus with a charge of 79e. What is the electric force acting on the alpha particle when it is 2.0e-17 m from the gold nucleus?

Homework Equations


FE=k(q1q2)/d2

The Attempt at a Solution


FE=k(q1q2)/d2
FE=9e9((2e)(79e))/(2.0e-17)2
FE=9.1e7 N

The answer in the back of the book says that it is 9.1 e -12 N.

Not sure where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want the force to be in units of Newtons, what should be the units for electric charge?
 
TSny said:
If you want the force to be in units of Newtons, what should be the units for electric charge?
It should be in Coulombs.
 
Randell Julius said:
It should be in Coulombs.
Yes. It looks like you made a minor error in expressing the two charges in terms of Coulombs. Check to see if you missed a factor of 10-19.
 
TSny said:
Yes. It looks like you made a minor error in expressing the two charges in terms of Coulombs. Check to see if you missed a factor of 10-19.
The value we used for e was 1.602e-19 Coulombs
 
Randell Julius said:
The value we used for e was 1.602e-19 Coulombs
Yes. Note that e occurs twice, once for each charge. So, how many factors of 1.602 x 10-19 occur in the numerator of the force calculation?
 
TSny said:
Yes. Note that e occurs twice, once for each charge. So, how many factors of 1.602 x 10-19 occur in the numerator of the force calculation?
2 factors of 1.602 * 10-19.
 
OK. My mistake. Since your answer was off by exactly a factor of 10-19, I assumed (wrongly) that you had missed a factor of 10-19 in substituting for the charges. Now that I have grabbed my calculator and checked your work, I'm getting the same answer as you. The distance for d given in the problem looks way too small to be reasonable. (It is much less than the size of a nucleus!) So, I think there must have been a misprint in the problem statement for the distance d.
 
TSny said:
OK. My mistake. Since your answer was off by exactly a factor of 10-19, I assumed (wrongly) that you had missed a factor of 10-19 in substituting for the charges. Now that I have grabbed my calculator and checked your work, I'm getting the same answer as you. The distance for d given in the problem looks way too small to be reasonable. (It is much less than the size of a nucleus!) So, I think there must have been a misprint in the problem statement for the distance d.
Okay thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K