Alternating Series Estimation Theorem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem to the integral of the function sqrt(1+x^4) over different limits. It highlights that when changing the limits of integration, such as from [0, 1] to [0.7, 1.5], the series expansion must be adjusted accordingly to ensure convergence. The original series expansion around x=0 would not converge for the new upper limit, necessitating an expansion around x=0.7 instead. This adjustment leads to different error estimates, emphasizing the importance of considering the limits when applying the theorem. Ultimately, the discussion underscores that different limits yield different series and error estimates.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Consider the following:

\int _0 ^1 \sqrt{1+x^4} \mbox{ } dx = \left[ x + \frac{x^5}{2\cdot 5} - \frac{1}{2!2^2 9}x^8 + \frac{1\cdot 3}{3!2^3 13}x^{12} - \frac{1\cdot 3\cdot 5}{4!2^4 17}x^{16} +\dotsb \right] _0 ^1

According to the alternating series estimation theorem, we find:

\left| R_n \right| \leq b_{n+1} < \left| \mbox{ error } \right| \Longrightarrow \frac{1\cdot 3}{3!2^3 13} < 10^{-2} \Longrightarrow \int _0 ^1 \sqrt{1+x^4} \mbox{ } dx \approx 1 + \frac{1}{2\cdot 5} - \frac{1}{2!2^2 9} \approx 1.09

The limits up there are easy to work with. So, how about if we'd had

\int _{0.7} ^{1.5} \sqrt{1+x^4} \mbox{ } dx

instead? Do we need to take into account those limits when applying the alternating series estimation theorem? I mean:

\left| R_n (x) \right| \leq b_{n+1} (x) < \left| \mbox{ error } \right|

Thanks​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems pretty clear you'd have to take into account the limits, doesn't it? Different limits result in different alternating series so different error estimates from the nth term.

In your hypothetical case, there is another complication in that if you just plugged in the new limits to the series about ##x=0##, the series wouldn't converge for the upper limit. However, if you were to expand the integrand about ##x=0.7##, the series would converge over the entire range of integration, and you could just plug in the limits after integration. Clearly, in this case, dealing with the limits results in a different series from your original example.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
550
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
772
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
663
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K