Am i doing right for these two question

  • Thread starter Thread starter okevino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the condition \( a_n \to 0 \) in the series \( \sum a_n \) does not guarantee convergence. It emphasizes the necessity of understanding that while \( \lim a_n = 0 \) is required for convergence, it is not sufficient. The comparison to the harmonic series \( \sum \frac{1}{n} \), which diverges, illustrates this point effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and divergence
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of the harmonic series
  • Ability to analyze mathematical theorems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the formal definition of series convergence
  • Study the comparison test for series convergence
  • Explore the implications of the limit comparison test
  • Investigate other necessary conditions for series convergence
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of series convergence and the conditions that affect it.

okevino
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
see attachment
thanks.
 

Attachments

  • convergence2.JPG
    convergence2.JPG
    10 KB · Views: 403
Physics news on Phys.org
That a_n-->0 in [tex]\sum a_n[/tex] does not imply that the series is convergent. You should re-read that theorem in your notes/book more carefully to see what it's actually saying.
 
lim an= 0 is a necessary condition that
[tex]\Sigma a_n[/tex]
converge, not a sufficient condition!

The first one "compares" to the sum of 1/n which does NOT converge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K