Undergrad Properties of Line Integrals question

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving line integrals and understanding the properties of vector fields. A participant seeks help with questions related to the gradient and potential functions, specifically evaluating partial derivatives and confirming whether a given function is defined over a specified curve. Clarifications are made regarding the conditions under which certain corollaries apply, emphasizing that the function's undefined points impact the validity of those corollaries. The conversation also touches on the necessity of accurately graphing parametric curves and understanding their implications in the context of line integrals. Overall, the participants engage in a detailed analysis of mathematical concepts, ensuring clarity on the definitions and conditions relevant to the problem at hand.
  • #31
What is C1 and C2 and how are those related to C?
Is f a general vector function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
drmalawi said:
What is C1 and C2 and how are those related to C?
Is f a general vector function?
I think for both C1 and C2, x= cos(t), y=sin(t) where 0≤t≤2π and
1656851231513.png

and that's why
C1f⋅dr = C2f⋅dr =0.
Am I correct?
 
  • #33
WMDhamnekar said:
I think for both C1 and C2, x= cos(t), y=sin(t) where 0≤t≤2π and

Eh no, C1 and C2 must be related to C in some way and C must be a general closed curve. It should be written in your book. Btw are you sure they should be closed? indicates so, but are you really sure the question is formulated in that way? Otherwise, if they are closed, they should be related like this (but I do not know for sure since you are not providing enough info)
1656852746236.png
 
  • #34
drmalawi said:
Eh no, C1 and C2 must be related to C in some way and C must be a general closed curve. It should be written in your book. Btw are you sure they should be closed? indicates so, but are you really sure the question is formulated in that way? Otherwise, if they are closed, they should be related like this (but I do not know for sure since you are not providing enough info)
View attachment 303692
Whatever information you require is given in this example and related figure.

1656853233253.png

For more general proof, you read below given study material.
1656853619749.png


1656853884627.png
 
Last edited:
  • #35
So it is not a general theorem or such? Just for this example? Then you just calculate:
C1f⋅dr1 which is equal to 2π
and
C2f⋅dr2 which is equal to -
 
  • #36
I mean, don’t lose track of the underlying purpose of that example: To demonstrate an application of Green’s theorem to a region with holes in it where the boundary is not a single closed curve but a union of several closed curves. In those cases Green’s theorem relates the sum of the line integrals over those closed curves to a surface integral over the contained region.

I do disagree somewhat with figure 4.3.4. There is no need to cut the region into several regions. It is enough to introduce enough cuts to make a single bounded region without holes. I used this myself last year when installing guiding cable for a lawnmower robot in my garden.
 
  • #37
Orodruin said:
I mean, don’t lose track of the underlying purpose of that example: To demonstrate an application of Green’s theorem to a region with holes in it where the boundary is not a single closed curve but a union of several closed curves. In those cases Green’s theorem relates the sum of the line integrals over those closed curves to a surface integral over the contained region.

I do disagree somewhat with figure 4.3.4. There is no need to cut the region into several regions. It is enough to introduce enough cuts to make a single bounded region without holes. I used this myself last year when installing guiding cable for a lawnmower robot in my garden.
Just one question:
Does author want to say Green's theorem holds for 'multiple connected regions' instead of ' multiply connected regions' ?
If no, would you distinguish between 'multiple connected regions' and 'multiply connected regions'
 
  • #38
WMDhamnekar said:
Just one question:
Does author want to say Green's theorem holds for 'multiple connected regions' instead of ' multiply connected regions' ?
If no, would you distinguish between 'multiple connected regions' and 'multiply connected regions'
No. Yes.

The concept of being multiply connected is a topological concept that effectively tells you that a region has holes in it. It is in contrast to simply connected region.
 
  • Informative
Likes WMDhamnekar
  • #39
Imagine a connected region in the plane bounded by a finite number of closed curves. a transverse cut is a path in the region whose endpoints lie on the boundary. such a region is simply connected, or 1-conncted, if any transverse cut separates it into two pieces, and a region is n+1 connected if any transverse cut that does not separate it, changes it into an n connected region. E.g. a region is doubly connected if any transverse cut separates it into a simply connected region. I.e. an annulus, the region between two concentric circles, is doubly connected. Removing n disjoint discs from the interior of a disc gives an n+1 connected region.

these definitions are taken from Riemann's paper on the theory of abelian functions, where he introduced these ideas, (and apparently created the subject of topology).

see the simply connected (einfach zusammenhangende) and doubly connected (zweifach zusammenhangende) surfaces depicted on page 9 of his paper: (which are similar to figures in your posts 29, 34)

https://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Riemann/AbelFn/AbelFn.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Orodruin

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K