Amateur microscope mostly for children

Click For Summary
Amateur microscopes for children typically offer magnifications of 1000x to 2000x, which is sufficient for exploring bugs and onion cells for fun rather than research. USB microscopes are recommended for their ability to save images, making them useful for school projects. However, many advertised high-magnification scopes often provide "empty magnification," meaning they lack the clarity and detail expected at those levels. It's suggested to consider models with lower magnifications, such as 25x to 400x, as they can provide a more enjoyable and practical experience for kids. Overall, choosing a quality, user-friendly microscope is essential for fostering interest in science.
  • #31
Here’s a Swift Nine Fifty. High School level scope. I bought one years ago for $40 on ebay. Works pretty good.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Swift-Microscope-NINE-FIFTY-Series-4x-10x-40x-Great-Condition-/221335123092
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
For young kids especially, I would recommend a different (and free) approach. Some years back, I started a program to collect and donate old microfiche machines (if you're old enough to recall those) to local schools, to be used as "projection-style microscopes." Magnification is typically around 50X, very useful for group viewing, and inserting stuff to view (e.g. algae, onion skin, salt, etc.) is fast and easy. So is moving the area of viewing. I did find an archive of the website with images I had set up for this. You may still be able to find companies that have a few old microfiches in storage, which they should be happy to give away for education.
Image Gallery: https://web.archive.org/web/20050411050643/http://gemini.oscs.montana.edu/~rayf/photos.htm
Main Page: https://web.archive.org/web/20050405210039/http://gemini.oscs.montana.edu/~rayf/micro.htm
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, Andy Resnick and BillTre
  • #33
So many excellent solutions to a wide variety of questions. If the OP is not a teacher then I suspect he/she is a grandparent or equivalent. I am convinced that what's needed is something robust enough to use out in the field, carryable in a pocket or small pack and non electronic. Small relatives need results fast if you want to keep them interested. I have noticed that the 'quality' factor that adults are concerned with is way down the list for kids. My grandkids play very happily with my old Pentax binos which are well out of collimation; I cannot use the things. Same with using astronomical telescopes. They are looking for different things from adults and the need to be in their teens before they are prepared to deal with the fiddly bits of hi tech equipment.

The microfiche reader would have been great a few years ago (I would have loved one at school) but classrooms tend now to have video projectors and big screens so a USB microscope would be easy to store and hopefully the teacher would be familiar with the idea of using the app - and its filing system.

As always, it's horses for courses. The age of the kid is a major factor.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
18K
  • · Replies 292 ·
10
Replies
292
Views
10K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K