Ambiguous Problem Statement on Determining Speed of Aircraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter vcsharp2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ambiguity of a physics problem regarding the speed of an aircraft, where the observer's position relative to the aircraft is not clearly defined. The original poster found two different solutions, with one aligning with the textbook answer, raising concerns about the problem's clarity. Participants noted that the lack of specific details, such as the aircraft's path and the observer's location, leads to multiple interpretations. There is a broader frustration expressed about the prevalence of ambiguous questions in high school physics textbooks, which can hinder student learning. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clearer problem statements in educational materials to facilitate better understanding.
vcsharp2003
Messages
906
Reaction score
178
Homework Statement
An aircraft is flying at a height of 3400 m above the ground. If the angle subtended at a ground observation point by the aircraft positions 10.0 s apart is
30 degrees. What is the speed of the aircraft?
Relevant Equations
s=vt, where s is the distance travelled at a speed of v in time t
When I attempted this problem, I came up with two different solutions and answers, and both seem correct to me. However, the answer obtained by the first method is correct according to the book.

The methods I used are as in screenshots below.

Isn't the problem statement ambiguous, or maybe I am missing something?

In diagrams below, point ##G## is the observation point on the ground, ##P_1## is the initial observed position of the aircraft and ##P_2## is the final observed position of the aircraft.

CamScanner 12-02-2022 10.22.jpg
CamScanner 12-02-2022 10.22_2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The relative position of the observer isn't given, so you're right. Note that there's more possibiliites, if you don't assume the aircraft's path is directly overhead the observer.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
hmmm27 said:
The relative position of the observer isn't given, so you're right. Note that there's more possibiliites, if you don't assume the aircraft's path is directly overhead the observer.
By more possibilites, you mean the situation where the vertical line from ##G## going up does not intersect the line ##P_1P_2##, but intersects the extended line from ##P_1P_2##.
 
vcsharp2003 said:
By more possibilites, you mean the situation where the vertical line from ##G## going up does not intersect the line ##P_1P_2##, but it intersects the extended line from ##P_1P_2##.
As well as the two most reasonable possibilities - the observer's position being directly under the aircraft's path at either the start(/finish) or midpoint of the observation - it could well be 100 miles away.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
hmmm27 said:
As well as the two most reasonable possibilities - the observer's position being directly under the aircraft's path at either the start(/finish) or midpoint of the observation - it could well be 100 miles away.
I am curious whether there is a Physics book for high school students that is known for having an accurate list of questions/problems, and not ambiguous questions/problems. Maybe there is no such book in the whole world.

Ambiguous questions/problems discourages a student from studying Physics.
 
If there was, we wouldn't hear about it o0)
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
hmmm27 said:
If there was, we wouldn't hear about it o0)
It's sad that no one in this world can come up with an accurate list of questions/problems in high school Physics.
 
vcsharp2003 said:
By more possibilites, you mean the situation where the vertical line from ##G## going up does not intersect the line ##P_1P_2##, but intersects the extended line from ##P_1P_2##.
Indeed. In addition, the problem does not state the vertical intersects the pathline of the aircraft.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
256bits said:
Indeed. In addition, the problem does not state the vertical intersects the pathline of the aircraft.
Or even that the craft is flying in a straight line.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
  • #10
vcsharp2003 said:
It's sad that no one in this world can come up with an accurate list of questions/problems in high school Physics.
But not surprising. Unambiguous problems are a dime a dozen. There are lots of them. We tend not to notice them. It is the ambiguous or otherwise bad ones that you remember and complain about.

Since complaints about textbooks produce no useful relief for the complainer, we develop coping strategies. Strategies that may be useful in the real world where the problems with problems get much worse. [In the real world, they don't give you the information you need. The information they do give you may be incorrect. The problem they give you may not be the problem you need to solve. And a solution may not even exist].
 
  • Like
Likes I_Try_Math, Lnewqban and vcsharp2003
  • #11
Finally I found out that this problem is really ambiguous. I saw many solutions out there, on YouTube and on Google, and all of them assumed that the observation point is midway between the airplane path. Such problems should not be included in such a reliable book ! How can I get it removed?
 
  • #12
Shreyansh_1110 said:
Such problems should not be included in such a reliable book ! How can I get it removed?
What book are you talking about? Removed from where?
 
  • #13
kuruman said:
What book are you talking about? Removed from where?
From what I can Google up, it is from the 11th grade CBSE question bank in India. I did not find an authoritative free-to-view copy.
 
  • #14
jbriggs444 said:
From what I can Google up, it is from the 11th grade CBSE question bank in India. I did not find an authoritative free-to-view copy.
Thanks. I wonder whether the original problem was accompanied by a diagram and the OP got a copy without it. A similar PF problem here does not suffer from ambiguity.
 
Back
Top