Amplitude and Velocity of Component Waves

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a string vibrating according to a specific mathematical equation, with questions focused on determining the amplitude and velocity of component waves, the distance between nodes, and the velocity of a particle at a given position and time. The subject area pertains to wave mechanics and standing waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the standing wave equation and its component traveling waves, questioning how to express the standing wave as a sum of these components. Others express uncertainty about interpreting the parameters of the wave equation, particularly regarding amplitude and phase constants.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the wave equation and its components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of standing waves and the relationships between various wave parameters, but no consensus has been reached on the specific interpretations or calculations needed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the phase constant and the need for clarification on the time variable in the problem statement. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the wave relationships involved.

Okazaki
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A string vibrates according to the equation y(x,t) = 2.0*sin (0.16x)cos (750t) , where x and y are in centimeters and t is in seconds. (a) What are the amplitude and velocity of the component waves whose superposition give rise to this vibration? (b) What is the distance between nodes? (c) What is the velocity of a particle of the string at the position x = 9.0 cm when 3 t 5 10− = × sec?

Homework Equations


y'(x,t) = [2ymsin(kx)]*cos(ωt)

The Attempt at a Solution


...I'm honestly not too sure here. See, I know that the equations match up so that:

2ym = 2.0 cm
ω = 750 Hz
k = 0.16m-1

But I'm not sure what to do with this. Does this mean that the original wave(s) that make up this new wave (so the component waves) both had an amplitude of 1.0 cm (and etc.)? Or am interpreting this horribly wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello there,

If y(x,t) is the superposition of component waves, it should be possible to write y(x,t) as a sum, right ?
Since y(x,t) looks like a standing wave (x and t "oscillate independently"),
it's probably a sum of something that moves in the +x direction and something that moves in the -x direction.

You need expressions for those traveling waves in the same terms as the standing wave.
 
BvU said:
Hello there,

If y(x,t) is the superposition of component waves, it should be possible to write y(x,t) as a sum, right ?
Since y(x,t) looks like a standing wave (x and t "oscillate independently"),
it's probably a sum of something that moves in the +x direction and something that moves in the -x direction.

You need expressions for those traveling waves in the same terms as the standing wave.

That's what I'm struggling with. I don't know how to find it when there's a phase constant.
 
What phase constant ? Are you mixing up with another thread ?

Check out how Two sine waves traveling in opposite directions create a standing wave at Penn State.
Also note that his y(x,t) looks a lot like the one in your exercise.
In fact I am afraid that's already an enormous giveaway.

I don't know at what level you need assistance: are you familiar with the wave equation ? Wavelength, relationships between v (or c), ##\lambda##, ##\omega##, f, k ?

Note that ##\omega## is not the same as the frequency: f = 750 Hz, but ##\omega## is something else and has a dimension of radians/s
 
BvU said:
What phase constant ? Are you mixing up with another thread ?

Check out how Two sine waves traveling in opposite directions create a standing wave at Penn State.
Also note that his y(x,t) looks a lot like the one in your exercise.
In fact I am afraid that's already an enormous giveaway.

I don't know at what level you need assistance: are you familiar with the wave equation ? Wavelength, relationships between v (or c), ##\lambda##, ##\omega##, f, k ?

Note that ##\omega## is not the same as the frequency: f = 750 Hz, but ##\omega## is something else and has a dimension of radians/s

Oh yes...it appears I am mixing up threads. Sorry about that. :/
 
Well, then I will have to wait patiently...
And before we continue you could perhaps improve on the
3 t 5 10− = × sec​
in the problem statement ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K