Amplitude of harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the amplitude of a driven simple harmonic oscillator with a sinusoidal driving force. The steady state solution is expressed as a combination of sine and cosine functions, specifically in the form: (sin(wt)*(1-w^2)-cos(wt)*w)/f(w). The amplitude of the steady state solution is confirmed to be 1/sqrt(f(w)), where f(w) is defined as (\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2+(\lambda\omega)^2. The user successfully utilized Maple to verify their calculations and simplify the expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion and oscillatory systems
  • Familiarity with sinusoidal functions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Experience with Maple for mathematical computations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the "Driven Harmonic Oscillator" section in the provided document for deeper insights
  • Learn how to derive amplitudes in oscillatory systems using trigonometric identities
  • Explore advanced features of Maple for simplifying complex expressions
  • Research the implications of damping factors in harmonic oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on oscillatory motion, and anyone interested in mathematical modeling of dynamic systems.

longrob
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a simple harmonic oscillator system with the driving force a sinusoidal term. The question is to find the general solution and the amplitude of the steady state solution


Homework Equations



I found the steady state part of the solution. It is of the form:
(sin(wt)*(1-w^2)-cos(wt)*w)/f(w)



The Attempt at a Solution



I'm told that the amplitude of the system in steady state should be 1/sqrt(f(w)) but I can't derive it. Can anyone help ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use trig identity and reduce the equation to sin(A-B), amplitude is the factor by which the stated term is raised
 
But the coefficients of each sinusoidal term are different...
 
is your steady state solution correct? it gets crazy if i reduce it to some trig identity
and what is f(w) equal to?
 
Yes I'm sure it's correct. This is homework so I'm loathed to post the whole details. However, take a look here:
http://nuweb.neu.edu/dheiman/U600/DHO.pdf
Look at the section "Driven Harmonic Oscillator" on page 4. The solution given is exactly what I want (with lambda, w_0 and F_0/m all equal to 1). I just can't derive it from my own solution. By hand I just used a trial solution of p.cos(wt) + q.sin(wt) and equated coefficients, which lead to the form I posted above. I also used Maple to check this, and it agrees.
 
The (1-w^2) factor isn't under a square root?
 
no, it's not...
 
Another look at this in Maple:
[Sorry, fiddling with latex...]
 
Last edited:
In Maple:
{\it s2s}\, := \,{\frac { \left( -{\omega_{{0}}}^{2}+{\omega}^{2} \right) \sin \left( \omega\,t \right) +\cos \left( \omega\,t \right) \omega\,\lambda}{{\omega}^{4}+ \left( {\lambda}^{2}-2\,{\omega_{{0}}}^{2} \right) {\omega}^{2}\\<br /> \mbox{}+{\omega_{{0}}}^{4}}}\]}

which simplifies to:

{\frac {\cos \left( \omega\,t-\arctan \left( -{\omega_{{0}}}^{2}+{\omega}^{2},\omega\,\lambda \right) \right) }{ \sqrt{{\lambda}^{2}{\omega}^{2}+{\omega_{{0}}}^{4}-2\,{\omega_{{0}}}^{2}{\omega}^{2}\\<br /> \mbox{}+{\omega}^{4}}}}\]}

And that's what I'm trying to achieve by hand...

Maple code is
s2s:=((-omega[0]^2+omega^2)*sin(omega*t)+cos(omega*t)*omega*lambda)/(omega^4+(lambda^2-2*omega[0]^2)*omega^2+omega[0]^4);
simplify(convert(s2s,phaseamp,t));

Thanks
 
  • #10
Oh, that helps. Note that the denominator is (\omega^2-\omega_0^2)^2+(\lambda\omega)^2. Consider a right triangle with one leg of length \omega^2-\omega_0^2 and the other of length \lambda\omega. Does that help?
 
  • #11
Indeed, yes. So easy now. Thanks !
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K