An attempt to the Unified Theory of Physics.

  • Thread starter Hymne
  • Start date
  • #1
89
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi!
I found a man that claims the following
The photon is nothing else that a hypothetical particle that Planck misinterpreted from his experimental data from his experiments with heat radiation within the optical wavelength spectra, where the temperature and wavelengths had been measured.

They could se a relation between temperature and wavelength. And he found after analysis of the data a constant and a continual difference between the wave units when he compared their temperature as a function of the wavelength.

What Planck saw that nobody else saw was that the wavelength increases constant and continual with the spreading.
In a try to understand this hidden difference Planck tried to relate the temperature to the wave units, but recalculated them the frequency units.
The relation between temperature and wavelength was already known by Wien's displacement law.

Planck had problems with understanding the explanation and his temporary interpretation became that between every frequency unit there was a energy quantum with the unit JS (joule second) that couldn’t be written correctly with the SI-system i.e. energy per time unit.

In this way the hypothesis that the energy difference between the frequency units is a quantified energy unit that isn’t deduced in a logical way or understandable.

Hubble found the same wave displacement but interpreted it as the Doppler Effect.
The galaxy-radiation’s wave displacement is 1 Ångström per 16 million light years which corresponds to the entropy displacement that Planck couldn’t understand (6,6 * 10^-34)

Read more at [crackpot url removed]

What is wrong and where does his theories fall?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,111
17
Mostly that is so confusing, that I wouldn't bother to find specific mistakes, but "the relative velocity of light" section at least is absolutely ridiculous to anyone who has understood the basics about special relativity.
 
  • #3
vanesch
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,028
16
You know, there are quite a lot of people we call "crackpots" out there, and they are especially noisy on the internet. We clean out PF for this ; if you want to know what happens to a forum where this is not done, have a look at the usenet group sci.physics.

To recognize them, here is the world-famous crackpot index:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

I'm going to lock this thread now, as we don't discuss crackpot cites (and after a visit, it is clear that the cite asked about by the OP is of this kind!).
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on An attempt to the Unified Theory of Physics.

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
838
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top