An experiment that claims to doom Bohmian Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on an experiment reported by Quanta magazine that allegedly undermines Bohmian Mechanics, a deterministic interpretation of quantum mechanics. Participants express skepticism about the validity of the claims made in popular science articles, citing issues such as noise, faulty methodology, and insufficient statistics in the experiments discussed. The conversation highlights the distinction between classical fluid mechanics and quantum-many-body physics, emphasizing that fluid mechanics serves as an approximation of the Boltzmann equation, which inherently averages out quantum effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Bohmian Mechanics
  • Quantum-many-body physics
  • Boltzmann equation
  • Fluid mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Boltzmann equation in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the principles of Bohmian Mechanics and its criticisms
  • Investigate the methodology of experiments in quantum mechanics
  • Examine the relationship between fluid mechanics and quantum theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the interpretations of quantum theory and the implications of experimental results on theoretical frameworks.

Jamister
Messages
58
Reaction score
4
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd ignore this. She had previous written that the experiments might support Bohmian Mechanics. Now it's the opposite. In fact neither article is correct, as the plausibility of Bohmian Mechanics is not related to the experiments being discussed.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/flui...rministic-pilot-wave-quantum-theory-20140624/
"Fluid Tests Hint at Concrete Quantum Reality"

https://www.quantamagazine.org/famo...ve-alternative-to-quantum-weirdness-20181011/
"The French pair’s earlier mistake is now attributed to noise, faulty methodology and insufficient statistics. "
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, vanhees71, Jamister and 2 others
Jamister said:
I read in the article in Quanta magazine

I would not trust anything I read in any of these pop science magazines. I have yet to see a single claim made in one of them that was a reasonably accurate version of what the actual peer-reviewed paper in question said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattt, vanhees71, Jamister and 1 other person
If there is anything classical then it's anything describable by fluid mechanics. From the point of view of quantum-many-body physics fluid mechanics is an approximation of the Boltzmann equation for situations where the medium is close to local thermal equilibrium. Already the Boltzmann equation smears over the microscopic details in a sufficiently coarse way to average out all quantum effects!
 
Moderator's note: Thread moved to QM interpretations forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
23K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 159 ·
6
Replies
159
Views
14K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
11K
  • · Replies 491 ·
17
Replies
491
Views
37K
  • · Replies 235 ·
8
Replies
235
Views
25K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K